6

Why the Islamic government of Bazargan, universities

Leads to the "new Baha'i" ?!

(Section 5)

From Dr. Mohammad Khaleghi Moghaddam-

Memoirs of a 16-year-old student from the University of Tehran

 

In this article, I try to address two issues, and the first is related to why the "Islamic Association of Universities in the years 1360 and 1378" collapsed? That was the plan to establish the Islamic Association of the University of Tehran and my plan, which had 37,000 members before the revolution or was created in two historical periods and was 11 years old in total, but unfortunately I admit that the phenomenon of the "Islamic Association of Universities and Plans" was successful in Iranian politics. It failed and failed! I admit that it was not "my theoretical plan and successful" and because of the policies of Engineer Bazargan, who was the first Muslim Prime Minister of Iran, and we failed, but I do not mean that it was a mental and "illusory" theory that failed. On the contrary, it was very effective in dismantling the previous regime or in 1978, or in launching the social reforms of Mr. Khatami's next term and "a completely successful plan."-Therefore, the situation in the country became much more acute and it was at this critical historical moment in Iran that Rafi al-Mulk Ghaem Magham, a cleric who wore a turban but was literate in the Pahlavi court, felt threatened by this situation and feared that not only religion in Iran would collapse but also Let the king himself and his government fall at the very beginning! Therefore, quoting his memoirs, he suggests to the Shah that he make arrangements for the authority to imitate Iran and the city of Najaf to enter Iran so that the situation in the country becomes secure. Will be read! And what about the "theory of the Islamic government of Bazargan" He had only a few supporters in Iran, so with the guidance of Rafi al-Molk to the Shah and before the death of Ayatollah Abolhassan Isfahani, who died in 1325, or with the encouragement of Rafi al-Molk, the Shah went to Firoozabadi Hospital in the city of Rey, Tehran. Ayatollah Boroujerdi, who was hospitalized in the same hospital and was "visiting", who was ill at the time, but did not yet have the "authority to imitate the Iranians," although he was literate and pious, no one knew him, so the meeting was widely reported in Iranian newspapers. Or the municipality of Tehran also created a culture of public opinion by throwing all kinds of placards, etc. in the city and atmosphere that after the death of Ayatollah Abolhassan Isfahani in Najaf and religious authority and by his hand and into Iran! And do not disturb and disintegrate this way and the dignity of the country and in those days! And unfortunately, Bazargan and his friends who are in "political ignorance" They have no equal and after the death of the deceased, by writing the book "Authority and Clergy in Islam" and decided to read the "Fatiha of religion" in Iran, and now they have taken the universities to this side! The mistake of our students was that by "establishing the Islamic Associations of Universities and universities, we made him and the first Iranian minister go and adopt the theory of Baha'iization of students or, in the form of his Islamic Prime Minister and Freemason-religious ministers, plant Weber in Iranian offices in 23 ministries." He himself and practically planted and today is the moral-administrative corruption of universities and the result of his policies and today many Iranians and God thank God that "Corona" came and this kind of seemingly scientific and educational environments were closed and the contamination of their children and in such environments Immorality should be reduced a little!

It should be added that Bazargan, in order to "complete his political theory" and in the five decades of Iran, has proposed five types of political slogans, which are his "theoretical foundations for the construction of an Islamic democratic prime minister" and are against the monarchy. This organization should be solved and the organization of theory should be called "religion and government" in Iran! And while the engineer of business and political or religious knowledge did not have the necessary "theory weaving" to understand the real logical connection between the two, which I mentioned in my other articles. I do ! But he thought that in the form of his mental slogans and the Islamic government would be established in Iran! And others blindly accept it and take special advantage of it! Or become famous in this way and ways! Therefore, in the first decade of his theorizing and his initial political theory between 1321 and 1330, he believed that if people come to his studies and read the pamphlet of purity in Islam or the pamphlet of religion in Europe, which he quotes a " "Engineer of Dideh University" has been written and then the Islamic government will be formed in Iran! However, due to his deep political or religious ignorance, he became more and more inverted. "Mossadegh" strengthens democracy or replaces it with "monarchy" in its political theorizing, while Mossadegh is a "Freemason" At the same time, he wanted to create a new government in Iran and for himself with the cultural help of Bazargan and his friends, or for Bazargan for his Qajar family with religious theorizing! Or by creating an oil controversy called "oil nationalization"! But Ayatollah Boroujerdi, and on the contrary, Bazargan, thought and knew very well that "the democratization of the Prime Minister of Iran or its inclusion in the constitution will take place in a society when a large segment of the Iranian society and the institution of the Prime Minister defend and defend!" They did not have any real supporters inside Iran and it was possible for them to come to power in Iran by creating too much controversy and vice versa! Or to remove religion from Iran altogether! In addition, Bazargan and Mossadegh were both political and religious theorists. It will not last long! But Bazargan and a few of his companions defended him with press controversy or with his own mosque speeches and also promised that with Mossadegh's rise to power, the table of all Iranians will be filled with "oil pit" instead of "bread on the table"! And to replace Mossadegh and the theorizing of the First National Front party with the "political institution of the Shah's monarchy" and the "religious democratic prime minister" to come out of the water! But Ayatollah Boroujerdi, contrary to the superficiality of Bazargan, thought and with a deep self-centered view knew that defending the democratic prime ministership of a society and other cultural needs that do not exist in Iranian society! Therefore, he was afraid of the naive thoughts of Bazargan Engineer and Safavid Nawab that he was the only simple student in Qom and did not support him or the Imam who were only simple students of his seminary and this created a deep resentment in them and towards Ayatollah Boroujerdi who after He died and many abuses were committed against him! However, Ayatollah Boroujerdi, with his deep knowledge of the institution of "religion" and his relationship with the "government", knew that in addition to defending an authority imitating Prime Minister Mossadegh or the government in drafting the constitution, other conditions were necessary for a democratic prime minister of a society. There is no such thing as "social institutionalization" in Iran! And why other than the components of the prime minister of the government and "other components of the legislature" or "military components" or "components of the judiciary" Etc. It is necessary for them to be in harmony with each other and to create profound political and social changes in the democratic institution of the Prime Minister of the same society or to be created like other societies! Therefore, they could not be set up by Bazargan Engineer or the supporters of the "allied delegations" whose members were only a few carpenters or handicraftsmen in the Tehran market, or whose knowledge was not enough to change the various institutions of Iranian society, or he knew that Mossadegh Businessmen and even a few people around them are not "loyal" to create or realize their desired "nationalism" or to create the thesis of "democratic prime ministership" or to draft the necessary constitution and become like other societies in the world or in Iranian society. Together and implement? ! Therefore, Ayatollah Boroujerdi, with his full religious awareness, knew that if he did not show neutrality, then the theory of the Tudeh Party would spread in Iran! And Bazargan Engineer and all the people of Iran will fall into the hands of the "political institution" and the Tudeh Party, and in addition, they will destroy "religion" and other societies in the world! Instead of the "theory of Islamism" sought by Bazargan and the allied parties of the bazaars, and in the 1940s and 1930s, only "acute atheism" and the like of other Asian societies will be given prevalence!-"Religious were written and there was no other religious character for all Iranians to call them" Iranian political growth "! But today some politically ignorant people have drawn his seemingly democratic thoughts into the political ideas of Iranian political science colleges in appearance." It is pretending to be a "Muslim theory", but it is not about religion! Therefore, this kind of "I brought Muslims learned Iranians" and how to deal with each other or in marrying each other or in administrative affairs with each other, which is the result of the intellectual instincts of Bazargan engineer and has disturbed the situation in Iran! The religious engineer was a merchant with the institution of the three prime ministers of the Shah, namely (with the model of the system of the prime ministership of Foroughi, Mossadegh, Ali Amini, and in the superpower of the signature of the king himself) and a merchant who fully complied with "their theory". Therefore, at their request, he has produced this kind of religious political theories for the merchants in Iran and left it for the Muslims of the future, which today has become the basis of many legal ideas and thoughts. In addition, the religious theory has destroyed the Iranian people themselves! Viaba has created this political theorizing of this kind and "neo-atheism"! Therefore, the thoughts of all three prime ministers were overwhelmed by his ideas, and apparently national and religious democratic models and the institution of the prime minister were considered in other societies of the world, but in the faculties of political science in Iran it was considered a "complete religious revelation" and then the institution of the prime minister was removed in Iran. The political giving of the Iranian people and the thoughts and ideas of the merchants and merchants were the demonstrators of religion and the merchants this time and in the "third decade of their theorizing" He gave his theory to the pro-movement movement and deceived other religious people because of Amini's rise to power. They were the East Indians of Tehran and took advantage of Ali Amini and sided with him. In this way, they did not claim to be democratized. To deceive technicians or scientists, etc. or to go along with the thesis of Prime Minister Ali Amini! In this way, too, a large number of religious lectures were given by the merchant, or books were published in the "Institute of the Publishing Company". The rented engineer Bazargan was published or other publications of the bazaars in the order between the two holy shrines and affiliated with foreign Freemasonry and was published. With cholera and in this way with him! Let Ali Amini theoretically magnify the opposition to the Shah's power! Or show it "democratic"! That Ali Amini was also in tune with the Democratic President of the United States, Robert Kennedy! And if three years ago some Iranian intellectuals and Prime Minister Dr. Iqbal Shah Via had asked Assadollah Alam, the court minister, to help form two "Party of Million" or "People's Party" and to establish the Shah's minister in his favor. This time, Bazargan also acted as a "religious intellectual" and the Freedom Movement Party National " Venice Ali Amini had also promised the Mutlaq Party to give a religious scholarship in exchange for the intellectual assistance of Bazargan Engineer or their Mutalifa Party and a number of religious scholars and members of the Mutalifa or Association! Or pay for their education abroad or at home! Or with the approval of the Board of Trustees and the establishment of some religious schools of Welfare or Alavi or Jafari or Kamal and give them permission to obtain licenses in these religious schools under the supervision of Professor Reza Roozbeh! And in them to attack the religious achievements of Ayatollah Boroujerdi!-This year, with the death of Ayatollah Boroujerdi and the administration of the Islamic Center of Hamburg or London, etc., he also fell into the hands of a merchant, etc., which had been built by Ayatollah Boroujerdi before, or with Iranian money, and abroad, or during religious lectures. Inside the country, and later in the hands of merchants, who had previously received permission from Ayatollah Boroujerdi to run his office, or asked Omi about the religious nature of that kind of speech and religious inquiry !? Therefore, in this historical period, the slogan of national oilism was no longer given by Bazargan Engineer, but by Bazargan Engineer, who wrote "The Book of Islam, a Fighting and Productive School" or another book called "The Way of the Prophets" and started his freedom movement. Has become the prophets "stick and therefore" the third Islamic thesis " He had introduced himself to university students and instead of Ayatollah Boroujerdi and himself, he had become the source of new Iranian imitation. Ali Amini, who was the financial supporter of Bazargan Engineer and the government's treasury, was a Qajar born who killed sheep or vows to deceive the Iranian people. He would either go on Hajj or seek communication and foreign support with Robert Kennedy and his party in the United States, and so the thoughts of Ali Amini and the engineer Bazargan and Walaba were together to destroy them and the "true religious theory of the Iranians"! Or the Democratic Party of America also liked this kind of religious slogans of Bazargan and his friends! To act like Ghavam Al-Saltanah in the 1325s and to support the "Democratic Party made by Ghavam Al-Saltanah" It has acted on its own time, but this time in the form of a religious and national party of the Freedom Movement and has a political function for Dr. Ali Amini, or with the advice of Bazargan and against the Shah, build a democratic prime minister, or act like Mossadegh al-Saltanah in 1332 and this time in the third decade was another city. Or after 1339, Ali و Al-Dawlah and the first Muslim minister of the level of the Shah will be opened for Ali Amin al-Dawla! Therefore, this time they had the opportunity to call himself the Prime Minister and "Islamic Democrat"! Or to give his "prime ministerial power" and in the shadow of the religious thoughts of Bazargan engineer and better considered as "cultural power of the king"! Or let everyone know about "businessman theorizing"! Who had become his cultural advisor, and in this way, they used the "Shah" as a toy for their power, or as a "thesis of the commercial Islamism". He was caught, so the Shah, who knew Ali Amini from Bazargan Engineer behind the scenes, and hurried to the United States and reached out to Robert Kennedy to remove Ali Amini or allow him to remove him from his post as Prime Minister! And his religious chanting is over. excuseme! But the work was over and he left his cultural influences on the people of Iran and in that period, in addition to Ali Amini, he acted under the slogan of "teacherism" by Mohammad Derakhsh, who had made himself the Minister of Education, and he gathers the teachers of Tehran for the sake of democracy. He had taken him to the streets of Tehran or to Baharestan Square in front of the Majlis in front of the Shah's governor. Or he also provoked a number of other nationalists called "Nationalists of the Second National Front" in "Jalalieh Square in Tehran" They gathered and held a big rally and therefore frightened the Shah and the power of their "Islamic Prime Minister"! And for these reasons, Bazargan, who in his "political theorizing" and until the Islamic Revolution and constantly woven his "religious theory" more and more. He said that the Shah should only rule and that "true democracy" in Iranian culture is only to hand over power to his own "Muslim prime ministers" and appoint Nazir Mohammad Ali Foroughi as prime minister! Either give it to the Prime Minister in the hands of Qawam Al-Saltanah or give it to Mossadegh Al-Saltanah Or give it to Ali Amini (Amin al-Dawla, grandson of Qajar) and finally give it to the Prime Minister of Bazargan and Imam Khomeini's term or hand it over in 1978! Yes, his "Islamic thesis" and "institution of government" and in Iran and so on, and therefore "religion" or "non-nationalization of oil" Etc., etc., was his only excuse, and after the fall of his government, he wrote the book "Revolution in Two Movements" so that he would not blame himself! Rather, he would put all the blame on others! Or by compiling the book! And while they did not create the "revolution" and the commercial engineer and his department? Nor the "second movement after the revolution"? Which is mentioned by two different movements of the book revolution! And only a Chinese opportunity of events. Iran had tried to bring himself or his friends to the power of the prime minister and in this way "forgive the moral head in Iran" or dismantle the Iranian families or displace a large number of Iranians with his own prime minister and displaced other countries ?! That he feels guilty about his actions! Or that he is known by the theory of his books and the first completely Islamic minister of Iran! In addition, this kind of opportunism deceived him and Bazargan's student students in the 1940s, who with his theory and the armed groups formed the Mojahedin Khalq, but he withdrew, or according to my theory, Bazargan and the Shah's reign and armed struggle, or in This way and thousands were killed! And while Bazargan himself did not believe in the same Islamic writings of his own, and an example of them and the content of his books "The Way of the Prophets" and his book "Islam is a school of warriors" that the Mojahedin did not see in Bazargan's behavior !? Therefore, they were affected by why they accepted the slogans of the merchant with their eyes closed or followed him with their thoughts and hands and with the naivety of their youth? Was either Dr. Tavassoli or Dr. Yazdi or Dr. Bani Sadr .. and ... He had been sent to the Masonic lodges of France and America to study Masonic theology and come to Iran and say that kind of unbelievable speech, or give a speech in Hosseinieh Ershad or the Hedayat and Javad Mosque, or give a lecture outside the Islamic Center of Hamburg! Should jihad rise or should they spend their time with Islam and lectures without moving? Or to some people and be given internal doctorate certificates by the order of Hojjatieh Association or be sent to welfare, Alawite and Jafari schools that had obvious Baha'i and political differences only with the prime minister but were not allowed to get involved with the whole monarchy and his army! The Shah had also agreed that some of the army chiefs should leave or leave in 1334 AH and the "Holy Shrine of the Baha'is" And in front of Amir Kabir University of Tehran, or allow the philosophical Hojjat al-Islam to speak publicly on state radio and against the Baha'is, or various Mahdis on Amiriyeh Street in Tehran, Mahdieh in Rasht, etc., and against the Baha'is and in those Mahdis. The Baha'is of various Iranian cities have been prosecuted or spoken against! Or some mosques and examples in front of the Pepsi Cola factory of Habib Sabet Pasha Baha'i should be beaten, but the same members of the Hojjatieh Association have pledged to the Ministry of Interior not to speak against the whole monarchy and political speeches! And for this reason, in their religious meetings and religious schools, it was permissible to speak against the Baha'is and only to speak, but it was not permissible to speak against the Shah himself!-His religion had produced him, and for example, according to their own book, in 1323, some British agents in Mashhad came to him, who was after Reza Khan left Iran and took off his turban, and wanted to look for another job and profession, but He also recommended that he could attract some stratified people and attract them, or grow the Hojjatieh Association, or make it bigger, or increase its members! Or to attract its members and get a government license or to form its meetings! Or they can even get concessions such as establishing a religious welfare school or publishing a magazine or sending a student abroad, such as Dr. Soroush's foreign scholarship, etc. Let them speak in the mentioned meetings, which is accompanied by the prayer of Nadbah or the prayer of Samat, and only against the Baha'is of the Pahlavi government! Or publish Weber's article against them! Or to fight with the management of the Baha'is of Mashhad who were intensifying the incident of Goharshad Mosque in Mashhad! But because the Americans or the British had invested inside Iran! Or they had banked! Or they had invested in industry! Therefore, the continuation of their speech and against the Shah himself and his investment will endanger them inside Iran! And therefore, they must guarantee the Ministry of Interior that their political speech or in those meetings must be done in a controlled manner! And do not question the whole political system! It was in this context that they were allowed to establish various religious schools, of which "Ustad Roozbeh" was in charge, or they held various religious meetings in different cities, and in addition, the members of the association also benefited from domestic or foreign scholarships. In addition to the controlled printing press of these two "religious groups" was also free, such as the "Freedom Movement Association"- Religious "has also appeared in Iran were found contents morality of Islam and the destruction brought that to their role in the history of the last 150 years cultural circles or academic or artistic Iran be referred to or in the media or in publications Masrmzhby or political attention Or pay attention to the motive for establishing a publishing house, which is usually neglected by the public! And in the shadow of this kind of negligence and Masonry -Religious people have grown like mushrooms, so they are spreading the "new Baha'is in Iran"! And "Masons secular" and in the Pahlavi period and before only in the environment of "universities and schools" of the Pahlavi period were less dangerous and had only a special scientific function and therefore did not lead to the destruction of society or Iranian families and departments or harmed Iranian families. They were healthy and happy during the Shah's period, and in addition to the social function of the "secular Masons" of the Pahlavi period or their "group organization" in the Pahlavi period, and only in the "Lottery Clubs" and "Lay Lodges".-Just listen to the hadith or the religious Qur'an in that meeting! Or instead of religious speeches, do not use only political rhetoric or Quranic meetings! The rest of the members hid or by hiding their security role in the mentioned period, they also abused the "religion of Islam" or presented their Islamism in a different way! And the purely religious people of the Pahlavi period are in trouble, but they themselves have a special interest in material exploitation and for all Iranians and make the occurrence of the revolution or the cultural revolution after it and suspicious! Who caused it to fall? Did they die? Or in this regard and destroy the "religion and politics" mechanism! Or to deviate with their market religious beliefs! And while the "religious meetings" of the second Pahlavi period, which is the basis of "religious learning" by Iranians, has a collective mechanism, and why human and individual learning does not take place! Rather, it is done through group learning or group meetings! "Therefore, in terms of political sociology science groupings and all."

1- (Religious group meetings of the former Hojjatieh Association, which was in most cities and was organized by the Ministry of Interior to gather in religious meetings in different cities, or some religious schools and licenses, such as welfare or Alavi school, etc. In this type of meetings, they should express their purely religious thoughts and beliefs, and in addition to some semi-political speeches, they should speak out against the existing Baha'is. Get a political group!)

 2- (Religious meetings were group movements of the Freedom Movement Association, which had received permission from the Ministry of Interior to speak in controlled religious meetings in mosques and amphitheaters of some scientific circles of different cities, or in some university student circles that are invited or in the Islamic Center Hamburg, etc., which was controlled by Parviz Sabeti and controlled by the Shah's cousin, and in the city of Hamburg and Hosseinieh Ershad, which was politically controlled, to express their purely religious thoughts and ideas, as well as some ordinary words with a semi-political flavor or against some administrative methods of second-rate managers. Pahlavi or, contrary to the administrative procedure, the managers of the Pahlavi government should be beaten without endangering the entire regime!)

3- (Religious group meetings of ordinary Quranic associations that did not get permission from the Ministry of Interior to gather in their religious meetings or in different cities or in the mosque of some universities and express their purely religious thoughts and beliefs, but their political speeches are completely controlled Political speeches in those meetings were forbidden, or their political decisions in the religious meeting were forbidden, and only the expression of their purely religious beliefs was free, and this was because the Qur'anic meetings were banned during the reign of Reza Shah, but after Viaz left. Iran was liberated, but at the same time as its freedom, but in each of these religious meetings, several people were secretly planted to report and control political statements or political group decisions, or to report, but to express the purely religious beliefs of the same people, and work Therefore, teaching such religious meetings could not and would not start the Iranian revolution!And because most of the people of Iran also went to such religious meetings and therefore with such a system and could not be the creator of the revolution and therefore the television media and about the revolutionary masses of the Iranian people and false portrayal

 Thus, contrary to the demagoguery of some Iranian bazaar pilgrims or satanic writers of some publications or media or ordinary people in the streets and markets and they are not the creators of the Iranian revolution and it was only the university students who created the "revolution" that is subject to the framework. There was no special politics in his behavior, and the same 37,000 students of the Islamic Association of Universities, with the thesis of the Cultural Revolution Headquarters and the name "Islamization of Universities", became obsolete or lost their subsequent effects, so today, in the case of acting as administrators, the texts of Quranic verses and offices It is not possible and also their kind of administrative actions and Islamic deeds are pure and are reflected in government publications and in addition the visual media make them look like this and without measuring them with Quranic content !! 

But after the fall of the Shah and his government, he is forgotten, and are they allowed to form a new government? Or according to their policy and they will be able to act or not? Or not? But they had gone to the way that the engineer Bazargan had taught them (in relation to religion and government)? Or he had put them in front of them and without thinking about the consequences !?

 5- And the fifth group were also the children of "Islamic Associations of University Students" who after 1351 AH when Hosseinieh Ershad and Hedayat Mosque were closed or the Mojahedin organization was disbanded or in 1352 AD was disbanded and in addition "the method of their fathers" And in teaching, they did not like "ordinary Qur'anic meetings" to go to Qur'anic meetings without political discussion and meetings that would destroy the relationship between religion and politics! Or in the mechanism of the policy of separation (religion from politics) and they did not find it to learn that the great authorities such as Ayatollah Boroujerdi or Ayatollah Khoei or the great verses of Golpayegani, etc. knew that method better and better. Or in collaboration with the "Leftist Student Associations of the University"-And established in the universities that were initially named and "Student Scientific Associations" but gradually instead of "Scientific Association" and "Girl Play and Bang Association" became a social fashion in universities, so forever and Islamic associations in universities disappeared or "religion" "It went astray in the universities, which used to create" administrative, staff and educational discipline "! This is because the relationship (religion and government) was learned with a superficial view by Bazargan, but the Iranian people have not found any political or religious information or administrative information in this case! Or all kinds of publications or national media. They do not have religious and television information about how it was formed! Or do they not know that religion and by whom it may be realized? The merchant gang, regardless of the questions of others, considered themselves and only experts in the religious interpretation of the Qur'an and in the eyes of the media! Dr. Mohammad Khatami also had this problem, so he believed that he could run universities without the Islamic Association, or implement the standards of the Islamic government or the religious government only through his ministers, and if Imam Ali had not succeeded in his short 5-year Islamic rule, but Are they able to form it with their engineering degree or doctorate in theology, and the rest have to wait and see what the result will be or remain silent? Therefore, looking at the issue of relationship (religion and government) and this kind of social situation has created or created for Iranians? And why Iranians do not understand the meaning of secularism well! Not the principle of "integration of religion and politics" Know? Who believes in separation (religion from politics)? Do they not know the meaning (our religion and our politics)? They have learned from their mushroom university courses to understand what was the purpose of Dr. Bani Sadrvaz writing the book "Teacher"? Or what about writing the book "Islamic Economics"? Who did not specialize in that subject? Or to understand that he is a descendant of Sadr and a Mason of Hamedani, who for the first time wrote the "Teacher's Book" and advocated the thesis of "integration of religion in politics", which is the source of religious imitation of his own actions or those of his managers in dealing with people. Do the actions of its administrative staff? "Should the president be questioned or should he be questioned by the people? He also had a way of thinking about the" relationship between religion and politics "and was like the thoughts of a commercial engineer. In addition, the Central Bank of Iran later claimed to be an imitator of the Iranian people."-The political organization of the program or the oil company and more experienced people to manage them so that they do not get into a crisis while the students and the most educated people are Iranians or tell the people to "form an Islamic state" and for such literate Iranians and my work or ministers Is it not or in the professional skills of my 23 ministers, I am not a businessman? Do all my ministers have less engineering or administrative knowledge than the mentioned academics who study engineering at the University of Technology or Tehran or have studied politics well at the University of Tehran? Or their professors gained during their university studies, and if you are the young Iranians who created the revolution and you can be the "first Muslim government" Set it up and then say hello to how to implement it? And my job is 23 ministers and with their incomplete foreign education or they are not able to do it? But did you not give up your ambitious Islamic claim until the last moment? Or did you consider yourself completely divine in appointing different people to administrative organizations! But later, with various lies, he again compiled the "Book of Revolution in Two Movements" and To show himself as innocent and blame the problems on others! But he had forgotten that the crisis he had created for two years and in Iranian universities and by his own decree had created further problems or was not due to the appointment of a minister appointed by the clergy? Rather, he was disabled by Dr. Shariatmadari or Dr. Hassan Arefi, who ruled over Iranian universities with his own ruling and created convulsions, or "revolutionary rule". They had been appointed, and in addition to receiving the said order, and from the hand of Bazargan Engineer, and had created this kind of belief in them that they are the most literate of all Tehran academics and industry? Or are they with the most pious Iranians? If Imam Ali, in the battle positions of Safin and his enemies, forgave his demands, but Bazargan's envoys to Tehran and other universities and universities were not in the wrong way and did not deal with 250,000 students with the unfortunate Iranian Savadia who created the revolution. They were ? But those people who were appointed as Bazargan engineers did not give up their claims that the students of Iranian universities were non-Islamic, and did not lead the Iranian universities to a 12-year closure, so they insisted on the "path of the prophets" in their freedom movement or insisted on teaching. "Islamic Education Teaching Book" Dr. Shariatmadari, the Minister of Science and Commerce, considered them as the most important commandments and verses of the Qur'an, which says that Layer Mankam is the hearer of Quman La Tadlwa), while the Qur'an mentions that in enmity with students or in hatred with us university students. And do not try with injustice! Or do not commit all kinds of religious crimes in producing injustices and for them? And yes, by mentioning the above points, my friends and I, 37,000 people, were expelled from the universities, or a large number of them fled abroad, and today we admit that with the formation of the "Islamic Associations of Universities" And our biggest mistake happened as university students, or with our student organization, we made Shams al-Dadi Mofidi, the Minister of Science, who had a more humane treatment go to Maha, and instead sit in the Ministry of Science and Dr. Shariatmadari, with whom we have been arguing for two years about the Islamicization of universities. We had a verbal conflict and in this tension, most of the students and even the leftist students did not want to get into a military conflict with the government and most of the Iranian cities would not be drawn into civil wars. If we had not closed the universities of our own free will, no government could have closed it. To do? And just as they had not been able to form the Cultural Revolution Headquarters for two years or were still unable to close it? Or when we closed these universities voluntarily so that there would be no civil war in Iran, or innocent people would not be massacred. Or Saddam will not take over Tehran and that They also used the withdrawal of the students as an excuse and considered it as a reason for the non-Islamic nature of the same university students. In the light of the opportunity, most of the students started clearing their educational files. Nowadays, according to Mr. Mohs Rezaei, only 30,000 people went to the fronts. And because of their military inexperience, they could not capture even a hill? But despite the difficult social conditions that were imposed on Iran and the Shah had said that after my departure from Iran and this country will become different Iranians! But still the policy of creating tension between Engineer Bazargan and Iranian students and in this direction! It is because of the hardships of their own livelihoods that they are willing to help "transform the political fabric" of the same society at certain points in human history, but Marx had emphasized to his own supporters that, contrary to the superficial directors of Iranian society, he had advised "Worker Lumpen of Tehran or Paris of France" Fear not, ministers who have dangerous social psychological characteristics and are such that they could even turn the "phenomenon of revolution" into "counter-revolution"! And for this reason, Marx thinks, contrary to the directors of "TV idiots", and the Lumpen class, the creator and creator, does not know any kind of revolution! Venice is based on the same theory of social psychology, which is accepted by the security organizations of different societies of the world, and for this reason, they go to the cadre of the urban lumpen class to staff their security department and take them in any regime and absorb their security organization. They try to hit other social strata and their morals, and a stratum that has a lot of greed but does not have the brains to maintain its system! And with the domination of this type of Lumpen-Weber strata, it was in the university atmosphere that the prevalence of sex or gangsterism and barbarism spread in the university environment or the new Baha'is settled in the campuses, which is the function of the freedom movement created by Ali Amini or the Bazargan engineer gang or a large share. And universities have played in the new and polluted space! Or forms the basis of their theory in relation to "religion and state"! And with the domination of this type of Lumpen-Weber strata, it was in the university atmosphere that the prevalence of sex or gangsterism and barbarism spread in the university environment or the new Baha'is settled in the campuses, which is the function of the freedom movement created by Ali Amini or the Bazargan engineer gang or a large share. And universities have played in the new and polluted space! Or forms the basis of their theory in relation to "religion and state"! And with the domination of this type of Lumpen-Weber strata, it was in the university atmosphere that the prevalence of sex or gangsterism and barbarism spread in the university environment or the new Baha'is settled in the campuses, which is the function of the freedom movement created by Ali Amini or the Bazargan engineer gang or a large share. And universities have played in the new and polluted space! Or forms the basis of their theory in relation to "religion and state"!