Zanjan and the ethnic roots of Afshar and their migration from Mangashlaq, Kharazim to Zanjan ( Tra
Zanjan and the ethnic roots of Afshar and their migration from Mangashlaq, Kharazim to Zanjan
( Transformation of ownership and government in Zanjan )
The first part
Research by: Dr. Mohammad Khaleghi Moghadam
Specialization: Anthropologist of Asian peoples
and rural sociologist
Since ancient times, each of the Iranian tribes had their own villages or estates and pastures, which were their ethnic lands, such as the lands of Kurdistan, Baluchistan, Tajikistan, Georgia, Armenia, etc., which had lands belonging to their own people, and the Afshar tribes or the heads of the Afshar tribes also lived in Zanjan province or in Neighboring provinces had their own tribal properties and pastures, but at the end of the Safavid period, there were conflicts between the Afshar and Qajar clans over the acquisition of political power, until the Afshar clan, which had more population or power, fell further and during the "25-year Nader government" period. Shah Afshar "gained power in Iran and took over the government, but due to the attack on the territory of India and China, he was angered by the Western countries, which was in the hands of the East India Company, and therefore he lost power with various tricks or in a short distance, and The "Afsharia government" with all its authority was disintegrated from the inside, and ultimately the people were on the groundAfshari did not lose his own and when the Afshar tribes lost their political power and this time "Il Qajar" and political conflict with foreign countries and was able to seize the political power of Iran and the control of the Iranian government fell into the hands of the Qajars, but during the period of the third government The first king of Qajar still made concessions with the "Afshar people" and the ministers did not have the power to remove the regional authority of the Afshars. Or they didn't have the power to expropriate the regional ownership of "the lands of the Afshar peoples" of Iran, and because they still didn't have the "power of ethnic theory" or "the power of local farms" or the legitimate cultural and religious power to show the ownership of the lands of the people in question, and just like "Zober's travelogue" also refers to the power of the Afshar people. "They are strong and armed" and at the beginning of the government of Fath Ali Shah Qajar, he mentions in his book that this kind of ethnic power and cultural remnants from the past of their history caused them to maintain their properties or villages for a while or the local management of their people's economy within the province. Zanjan and their own local management, but the Qajars took it from them with political trickery, or they had the special administrative system and employees of the villages and small towns! And for this reason, all of its inhabitants and at the beginning, like other provinces of Iran, and only from 5 to 6 great khans of the Afshari tribe Selfish They followed the healthy system of employees of their people, or about 102 years after the death of Nader Shah Afshar, these few people were the heads of the Afshar tribe and for some time the ruler of Khamsa and the lands and pastures of the Afshars, and in addition, they had this model of local political organization and economy since the Seljuk period. Ethnic interests or family interests or "regional economy" became theirs, and besides, they maintained their own group and regional interests by educating their children and that kind of group and regional interests, and besides, they did not know the harms and injuries of going under the Qajar rule, and they still did not know what it was? Or did they not know the model of the ministries of the English model of that government? And what a dangerous mechanism it has for them that "habituation" or "acculturation" to such foreign European political institutions will only make their lives black or even accept its administrative legitimacy. The ways and customs of the Asian continent and what are the disadvantages for them? The only people who worship foreigners are the Qajars Or was he just a forced cultural adopter of that way of behavior among 100 small Iranian tribes, or did he want to inject it into the culture of other Asian societies? Or was it only the Qajar people and promoters of the "English model" and Asia, but they did not know that due to the severe damage caused to their "government functions" and the blood group of other Asian peoples, it will not be included! And yes, they didn't have enough knowledge or the necessary close experience to force this kind of corrupt political model from the English, and even though they had tasted or seen this corrupt European political model once before in the period of Alexander the Great! They had thrown out the coercive political style and they had not accepted such a corrupt administrative and economic model in the typology of 56 old governments! But many European writers still don't know that when Iranians accepted the Seljuk and Mongol government model or accepted Sasi for 500 years, they were not Seljuks because of their love and eye brows of Halakukhan or Tughrel, but they knew that they, unlike the British and the ration-eating Qajar people, were so literate. And do they have the culture to rule the people of this great continent like the ministries or the Asr model on Britain and slavery 5000 years ago? that the Jew Marx advised the British in the same era of the Qajars to manage the people of Asia like the "ultimate commune of slavery" which was similar to the "primary commune model of slavery" 5000 years ago in ancient Egypt or similar to the slavery of ancient Babylon with all the claims of German philosophy He himself imagined that the literate people of Asia, like the wild Melanesian and Polynesian peoples, lack knowledge and do not know anything, so they can be brought back to the era of slaves 5000 years ago or with deceptive titles. "Government institutions of Qajar" return? And the people who had tasted the most advanced human administrative and economic police institutions in the Seljuk or Mongol era, that is, 1000 to 800 years ago, saw that the people of the other four continents of the world had not yet seen that administrative model, and only in the last 200 years were they able to "semi-administrative and urban culture" Will they find civilized people that can be seen in the urban sewers of London, etc.? And yes, unlike European political thinkers or computer or mobile engineers, they see themselves as the remnants of the army of Alexander the Great and in New Asia, and still 800 years ago and accepting the political government of the Mongols, they think wisely and wisely about their culture and for the holy sake. The knowledge of the leaders of this type of peoples was not that of shepherds, but they had wisdom and tact, unlike the current Qajar government, and they asked educated and mature people the difference between useful and useless offices, and then they "organize the government" or, unlike the prime ministers, employees, and publications of the Qajar era, they knew the difference. brought? In the same way, the first 450 years were against the stupid administrative order or the institution of the Arab government, and all the people of Asia stood up or resisted, like the Iranians, Turks, India, etc., and all the historical documents are proof that against the stupid model of the Arab government, there was a new type of calamity every day in Asia, etc. The Saffarian movement or the Sefid Jamgan movement or the Red Jamgan movement or the Zaidiyya movement of Tabaristan or the Asfar and Mardawij movement or Al Kakouyeh or the Hesudanians or the Jastanians or the Khawarij or the Zangians in Iraq, etc., were facing each other, and therefore their government did not have the possibility of "political institutionalization" or "the possibility of political sustainability" or They did not have the "possibility of useful political function" or "being useful for "adaptation by others or the future" which has a political or theoretical meaning" of the institution of the state and in political science and sociology, these are the 4 criteria, or were these "four special properties of the state"! And following this type of political model and the only cultural promoter of the state among Asian peoples who accepted the advanced administrative system of the Timurid, Seljuk, or Sassanid empires with these standards, or did it last for a while among Asian peoples? But at that time, there was still no government among the primitive tribes of Australia, Africa, Latin America, or even wild Europe, and even though they all had governments, they only had the model of "primitive tribal governments" and satanic centuries. They ate or like the "Inca government model" which after its collapse was no longer worth adapting or implementing in any society and "the government model or coercive ownership or administrative system - Qajar English also had such a medieval model in Asia and only with British publications." The religious deception of the members of the East India Company was dictated to the people of Asia, and it was like the "Inca government" and the disposable government model. Did the nature or the 200-year-old English masters not understand them? Ministers, the political institutions of the future world will come out of the pain of severe human suffering, or will come out of thinking about the existential philosophy of all the human sufferings of the last 30 years that Asian people have suffered with the advent of mobile phones or computers, or will come to Asian societies with the advent of cameras. It was found that they are only exploiting or abducting or enslaving Asian people or making people addicted to glass and obscenity. Asian people are being pursued or pursued by British companies, but it does not have any kind of benefit or feature for the industry or factory of any society in the last 4 years. It has led to the disruption of most of them or their professions! It has severely affected families or has led to the impoverishment of many people! Or have they just understood the "effects of the political model" in the Asian continent, or do they understand how the sweet life of 5000 old Asians has been disrupted with the emergence of the Qajar government? And while the mechanism of the previous 56 governments of Iranians did not make their sweet life bitter, or such people had not "enslaved and impoverished"! And the mechanism of such a political institution was not built for the Afshar people either, and it caused them to be deceived, and the ownership of hundreds of their Afshar villages was taken out of their hands, and all of them became the national wealth of the corrupt Qajar Khans, which I will present in my next article and documentary evidence, but the people are naive. The people of Afshar also thought at first that Qajar's goal was only to "form a national government" and they would not cause economic damage to all Iranian ethnic groups or confiscate their ethnic properties? And they only have the right to make political decisions for the fate of 31 provinces of Iran, and they do not have the economic right to confiscate their ancestral property, which the Quran calls "state usurpation", so Ali Shah accepts the Quran with his long beard, and therefore all the members of the Afshar tribe have been for at least 1000 years. They had their own ethnic lands, and the Mongols did not take them from them until they created a conflict with themselves, which was taken by the Qajars, but the Qajar Khans were given to the members of the tribe. Or are all the collective properties of all kinds of Iranian tribes and only the properties of the Qajar tribe considered, or do they also sign their selective assembly with the signatures of the Qajar king to give it to an individual or not? Although the population of the Qajars and one hundredth of the population of the rest of the tribes was not there, but by usurping the property of the rest, they could have inherited the headship of the Iranian government, or the headship of the army? They were born from the corrupt Qajar tribe, but with the corrupt publications of the constitutional democratic government and the corrupt ministries, these new cultural patterns were made by the British or the new swan worshipers, and they were given a religious cover and religious interpretation, or by the British salarymen, and it was interpreted that the Iranian book was the British salarymen or Mehdi Bammad's book or Sir Arthur Ding's book or Ismail Rayen Vasami's book have mentioned both of them in their book and the benefits and geography of life of all The Iranian people did not have any security from them, even though the governors of Zandiyeh and Qajariyeh were appointed for some time, and until the time of Naser al-Din Shah, they did not have the real power in Zanjan province, and they did not have ministers to implement the hidden goals of their government. The goals of the Qajars were "and it was because from the murder of Nader Shah Afshar in 1161 Hijri to 1266 Hijri, that is, until the beginning of the rule of Nasir al-Din Shah Qajar, it was still 102 years that the local authority of Afshar rulers of Zanjan did not disappear, that their lands or their economic interests were in the market. The cities are coveted by other Iranian ethnic groups or by the government's influential groups! In addition, stay strong in cultural affairs! In addition, at the very beginning, they were following religious and cultural followers from some important Afshari clerics who had studied in Karbala jurisprudence so as not to drag other ethnic groups into their land with their directional sermons and cultural interests! Therefore, a kind of ethnic-political-cultural foundation of the past 800 years remained until 1267 Hijri, or membership, socialization, or ethnic education became special, or they had their own ethnic period in 800 years, and in addition, the Afshar ethnic political institution with this old cultural style or with a cultural style Ancestors always had children, or they had a special political education, or this style of ethnic culture also lasted (or was preserved by the Ushar people of Ghaz or by the recent Afsharia) (a culture that Ibn Fadlan had seen with them or seen in the fourth century of Hijri) And besides, he mentioned "their cultural style" in his travelogue! They lived a collective life defensively, such as the resistance of "Taimur Malik" who bravely Khan Shuja Qangali left the city of Khojand against the Mongols, which all historians have written as an epic, and finally, according to the "Book of War of Zanjan", all men and women were killed without surrendering or betraying each other, and finally By killing all of them, and this time "the great Qajar Khan of Zanjan" won, or by killing "most of the Afshars of Zanjan", he became the ruler of all the cities of the province, and he took control of all the villages of the province, or he owned them all, which I will write about in my next article. I will present its documents in my next article, so the documents show that all the villages of the province or their pastures were owned by the Qajars! And then the signs of caravanserais or alleys are often changed, or the signs of mosques in Zanjan are changed, or the names of the owners of Afshari villages are also recorded as "Qajar property", but they have not yet been able to change the historical documents! Zanjan and its high schools are cultural, and before the government of the Afshars, there was no Ministry of Culture or Education, nor was there any cultural heritage during the period of Nadir Shah Afshar, nor was there any in Zanjan during the period of El Arslan Seljuk, or during the Turkish Aq Quyunlu, to document that cultural heritage officials are lying. that the mosques of Zanjan and Hamgi were built during the Qajar era, but at least they said that 30 mosques of Zanjan and Ghalib were built during our Turkish Seljuk governments, or the Qara Qoyunlu, Aq Qoyunlu, and Afshariyya governments, and they do not belong to the Qajar era? In addition to the documents of Clavichovia, the book of Dar al-Irfan Khamsa, and the evidence of the history of those old mosques in Zanjan! In addition, their Afshari clerics also died or were eliminated, there were about 400 clerics, or they were all massacred in the aforementioned incident, for example, the disciples of Mullah Muhammad Ali Zanjani, who were all killed, or Mullah Qurban Ali, who was later exiled to Iraq, and on the contrary, the clerics affiliated with Qajar and infiltrated In Zanjan province, they gained more preaching power in favor of Qajar and because of that, they became the owners of a number of usurped properties in the villages of Zanjan, which has come in the following documents to strengthen the political hegemony of the Qajar rulers with their mosque propaganda! Or will they be able to give Qajar orders and "religious legitimacy" to the rebellious Afshari people? They have said that they are before the Qajar era, but the Culture and Endowment Department of the Qajar era denies that it was only a Qajar manager appointed in Zanjan, and therefore they ignore the past religious and historical events of the city of Zanjan or its villages! And it has been installed on the door of all the mosques of Zanjan and "built in the Qajar era" or a cultural trend that is contrary to the text of Ayah al-Baqat Salihat, or the names of old taverns or the names of bridges, baths, and traditional water reservoirs of the city were changed, all of which were built by Muslim benefactors. The four Turkic governments were Seljuk, Qaraqinlu, Vaq Qvinlu, and Afshariyyah Turks! Therefore, in the reports of hundreds of European travel writers or historians, only the names of the Qajar rulers are recorded or they are written as the owners of Zanjan villages, which are mentioned in my next article, and I will refer to the names of those letters and reports! Or the names of the Qajar owners of the villages of Zanjan and from the same letters, it is clear that several tax auditors and documents mentioned them, or it was also written in the Qajar Court of Appeal, and in addition, the aforementioned government officials were also affiliated with the Qajar government, so in the documents, all of them or the names of all the owners of the villages Zanjan has been mentioned, or they are all registered as "Qajar owners" and "the Ministry of Finance" of the Qajar era, or they are all mentioned in the written and undeniable reports of the Ministry of Finance of the Qajar era, and it is similar to the reports of Mirza Ali Asghar Come ! Or in the reports of other important tax auditors of the Qajar era, as well as Basir al-Mulk Shibani's memoirs, it is stated that the government official sent Muhammad Khan Iqbal al-Dawlah, the general minister of Khalsaat, to the city of Zanjan. Or he used to come to the villages of Zanjan province for the benefit of the Qajar people and to collect the agricultural tax from the government. Or in the reports of Abdullah Mostofi of the Qajar court, it is mentioned in the book of my biography that he was an official employee of the finance department of the late Qajar era! I will mention the new owners of the Qajar villages in the villages of Zanjan and in the documentary letters of 20 to 30 rulers or even in their travelogues of the Qajar kings! who was supposed to be the ruler of Zanjan for a while, is it mentioned or written in some books or in memos such as the memoirs of Ehtsham al-Sultaneh and Nizam Mafi, or in his travelogue of Farangstan, Naser al-Din Shah Qajar mentions the names of the owners of Zanjan villages of his era! Or in his travelogue, Muzaffar al-Din Shah Qajar or Zahir al-Dawlah Qajar, who have letters from the villages of Zanjan, or in the memoirs of Ihtsham al-Sultaneh, ruler of Zanjan, or in the book Marat al-Badan of Wadib al-Mulk, or in the 10-volume book Ain al-Sultaneh and Sadr al-Tawarikh, it is seen that the historians of the Qajar era and I collected the documents of all of them with a lot of effort and then I made it as a research booklet called "Qajar properties and assets in Zanjan province" and edited it so that it remains for the future generations to judge, while before the era of Naser al-Din Shah "And the Qajar clan and people did not have any property in Zanjan!" Or they didn't have villages in the geography of Zanjan!
Zanjan and the transformation of ownership, government and the Afshar ethnicity in Zanjan
(conflict between the Afshar people of Zanjan and the Qajar Khans)
part two
Research by: Dr. Mohammad Khaleghi Moghadam
Specialization: Anthropologist of Asian peoples
and rural sociologist
And because the Qajar clan was the winner in the political competition between the adventurous and adventurous Doyles, the others had lost their political right with the formation of the Qajar government, and along with that, they also lost their economic right to turn over their properties, which in the theory of "English model ownership" that the contemporary Ministry of Finance administers does or privatizes and "such a model and theory exists between the "politics and economy" of a nation or a party or gang of the government and its employees and in the new capitalism, which is not possible without depriving the Afshars and others of their ethnic property rights or without destroying the family life or income of the nation Afshar Khamsa and the possibility of "political sovereignty of the Qajar people was not possible!" Or as a "modern Iranian government or its colonial ministries, or with the rest of the Iranian peoples and its regional administration" and it was not possible! The plan was that the budgets of the families of those deprived provinces would be dragged to a complete disgrace by his personal wishes and then the inflation caused by the decision of his administration would be imposed on it by the Baloch or Turkmen people or by the personal will of a few ministers or by the will of a few members of the Economic Commission of the Majlis. Let it happen! which was a completely mafia theory, whether it was taken in the province's financial administration, or in excessive taxation of the deprived population of a province, or it was taken for the benefit of an oligarchic gang of the government and governors of the province, or it was taken for the benefit of the capitalists in league with the banks! And the inspectors of the inspection are from themselves or they are taking non-optimal construction of the governorates or in the regional and agricultural development and agriculture administration of the provinces! Or this kind of poverty phenomenon was taught to the laborers that it was the creation of the theoretical thoughts of the political establishment of the Qajar state, or it was the product of the wrong teachings of the "tyrannical Qajar people" and the rest of the Iranian peoples and its population! The property that they have learned and they consider themselves to be the rightful owners of those anti-people and poor people's signatures? Or they have learned about money laundering in the cruel program in the organization, or they have learned about allocating the national budget under the deceptive title of wasting all the family budget, cruel or unnecessary, or they have learned about the intrusion and seizure of the bank accounts of 85 million Iranians, which the British called them as a new banking phenomenon. have they taught, or have they assigned only the signatures of a few employees to usurpate money and money in the pockets of all the poor people of Iran, and the people of Iran were deceived by the establishment of a bank in Iran and by the British, instead of leaving their money in the closet of their house and their only money to The bank account of this kind of employees of the Ministry of Finance has been left untrusted, or through corrupt journalists, and this kind of culture and propaganda is broadcast on TV. Finally, it has led to the deep economic misery of the Asian peoples and the current deep poverty, and people are forced to endure this exhausting type of new livelihood, or are they poverty-stricken and most of them resort to smoking drugs to forget the pains of the world or its sorrows? Either they have been forced to smoke cigarettes, hookahs and bongs after the Qajar era, which did not exist before, or they did not smoke because of their optimal livelihood, but it became popular after the Qajar era, or they will suffer from deep depression, suicides, and new obscenities in Asia, which the Mongols and in the old rural economy They didn't create the cities, or they didn't exist in the old economy, and all of them have led to the name of "modern capitalism in Asia", but it is still not discussed in the courses of economics colleges! Or at least for a while and be accepted by part of the population of Asia? But today, they are still unthought of and continue to be forced, or are they given by Google or Twitter engineers, who are also unthought of and given electronic devices? Is it because of the lack of political rationality of those Google engineers who restore such a rotten administrative system, or is it promoted as the "new electronic government" or is it called the legitimacy of political merit? And while the Qajar government did not know how to act wisely, or its dealings with all Iranian ethnic groups was stupid, but no one has read the history of their unwise interactions with the inhabitants of the cities, or they did not have a person of understanding in their government and constitutional council, or they did not form their own advisors for the government. Or didn't they have a wise minister, or didn't they do administrative work like in the past, and besides, they didn't have a history of being trusted by the rest of the tribes, so that political obedience from them would be acceptable? According to the community Religious or political liars or without administrative merit and they wanted to give orders to other Iranian ethnic groups or they wanted to be culturally superior to other Iranian ethnic groups and to rise higher in the power ladder or achieve the status of the government or become "ruler" over the rest of Iranian ethnic groups! Or bring the more populous tribes under the rule of their own ethnic group! Or are they bigger and bolder than their population in usurping the property, or are they greedy, but they could force the fake government or the fake parliament to continue their 100-year-old constitutionalism in Iran? But the British were only interested in the characteristics of such a cunning and deceitful people, or with an irrational character, and from the point of view of social psychology, they are not interested in the great people or Iranian virtues? By hiring thousands of gendarmes, Cossacks, city guards, or on the roads, they were able to keep the Qajar government from falling, or by hiring thousands of Indian soldiers and police in the south, or in all kinds of southern cities of Iran, they were able to put them at the head of power. Iran is holding back, either by relying on the British officers of its artillery or by giving them large sums of money to rob their own banks' pockets, and they were able to do so, such as the usurpation of the Shahnashahik Bank, which is now called the National Bank, and the example of the Borrowing Bank of Iran Varus, which used to be Sepeh Bank. Non-productive and continue? In addition, the survival of the Chinese government, the Russian government, the Belarusian government, or the Uzbek government is also possible in Asia and only with such a model, but the way of gaining power in the old 56 governments of Iran had a humanitarian and economic mechanism, and it was not like the mechanism of such a fraudulent and fraudulent Qajar government! but they themselves are the financial guardians of 85 million Iranians and they see their pockets of money that they approve in their own gang meetings and what kind of food rations for the people's table? By the order of the East India Company, Bombay and the building of the same parliament was built with expensive money from the sale of grain and flour, while the organization model of the Ministry of Defense was not as oppressive as the old one in Asia? Or did it not create such injustice in the eyes of Asians in the past? Therefore, the scientific comparison of the ministry of the old model of the Ministry of Finance and the exploitative model of the current Ministry of Finance shows it, or is it a sign of such a Ministry of Economy from the era of the Median government to the era of the Nasrid government, and how much "different administrative existence" has been found? Or how cruel the budgeting standards of tribes or families have become and (finally, with the said model, how many people in the cities fall into drug addiction, or how much They are sold and used to provide a meal) So, in the last 150 years, what calamities have befallen Iranians? And all the small savings of all Iranian families will be swallowed up, or the lives of 85 million Iranians will be ruined, or all of their bank accounts will be destroyed for the benefit of the personal desires of a few ministers who only have administrative desires, or it will be consolidated by the vote of confidence of a holy gang in the parliament. And they will make the trust bank accounts of corrupt people, whose accounting is with them or with the central bank, but all the people have become the general manager of the general treasury of the Ministry of Economy or the central bank, who have invented this cunning administrative method, or after Asr Naser al-Din Shah has arisen in Iran, but the poverty of the people is not important to them, and they only deceive the people who did not deposit their capital in the central bank or in the treasury of the National Bank or the Sepeh Bank instead of the personal safe deposit box of their houses. Now the money for their dinner table would not be placed in the hands of ministers or contractors or government employees, or with the aforementioned cunning mechanism, it would be placed in the hands of employees of the budget planning organization, or in the hands of stock room employees, or the decisions of members of parliament and their personal tastes, and they would be placed in their pockets. It would be safe, but nowadays they don't have the money to buy a piece of bread and the same money in their personal pockets, and it is all in the hands of a few central bank managers or in the hands of a minister in the Money and Credit Council, who wastes billions of people's money without talking to the people and for useless administrative tasks. slow, but the same people do not have the right to ask questions? Or do the same people buy their table meat for only half a million? But the same ministers or employees of the organization of the program and with the help of the military will waste 85 million Iranians with weapons in their hands and their trust money or personal bank account? Or "sometimes people's money without their permission and to the country of Venezuela And they mock that there is a possibility of wasting people's money, or is it possible in a foreign country, or is it 100% possible? And it is a model that the "Qajar government" has taught to the current ministers or to its employees, or to the concept of becoming a representative in the parliament and its economic commission! But there was nothing like it in the history of the past 5000 years of Asia! Or did this type of demagogic model and government suppression not exist or was it not in the past societies? Or was this model of gaining authority for ministers or being governors or parliamentarians and did not exist in the old days, that they waste the money in the trust pockets of the people and then do not put the necessary money for the necessary expenses of the people of Iran? Will their money be jeopardized by the ministers or MPs or by the lying reporters of the radio and television because of the philosophy of the constitution? ! But they are left helpless for their basic livelihood?! Do they do administrative work against the behavior of old relative ethnic singers? Or at least because of their kinship with them and in the old ownership system and they did not oppress their ethnic subordinates, or they did not oppress them like the model of "economic sovereignty" of the current members of the parliament, and the limits of their powers were only in the old "political institution" or only about Political issues were decided, and they did not have anything called "Economic Commission of the Khans", which, after obtaining a power of attorney, and the unfortunate subject and himself, "the client will reciprocate oppression, whether his medicine or food becomes more expensive, or there is no such thing in the verses of the Koran, and it is not called "Shari'a power of attorney" and besides. In the olden days, the concept of being a khan or the head of a clan was only in political matters, but it did not have economic options like contemporary representatives, or it did not have economic options to the detriment of the clan members, so that they could use their own political powers to be khans and not allow other Iranian tribes or strangers to have property, honor, and property. Will their relatives grab them? Or will they encroach on the lands, properties, and pastures of the people, their relatives, and their clan members? which happened during the "Qajar government" period, but with the advice of the British and these deceptive administrative models of the Qajar government became popular, or non-Sharia administrative affairs became popular, or this type of "deceptive pseudo-modern government" model was culturally popular, and they were called "the political institution of the modern state and Majlis" Or did they eat rations and argue in the press that the planning of a member of parliament is better than the traditional economy of their past? Or is it better than the decisions of Kadkhoda or Khan and is trusted by them and for the villages, or is the work of an employee of their family planning and budgeting organization more fair It is more than the former Kodkhodas, but it does not have the same employees and the air of the serfs, while the old houses in the countryside of Iran and the behavior is more humane with the peasants. And the members of their clan and give up? which happened during the "Qajar government" period, but with the advice of the British and these deceptive administrative models of the Qajar government became popular, or non-Sharia administrative affairs became popular, or this type of "deceptive pseudo-modern government" model was culturally popular, and they were called "the political institution of the modern state and Majlis" Or did they eat rations and argue in the press that the planning of a member of parliament is better than the traditional economy of their past? Or is it better than the decisions of Kadkhoda or Khan and is trusted by them and for the villages, or is the work of an employee of their family planning and budgeting organization more fair It is more than the former Kodkhodas, but it does not have the same employees and the air of the serfs, while the old houses in the countryside of Iran and the behavior is more humane with the peasants. And the members of their clan and give up? which happened during the "Qajar government" period, but with the advice of the British and these deceptive administrative models of the Qajar government became popular, or non-Sharia administrative affairs became popular, or this type of "deceptive pseudo-modern government" model was culturally popular, and they were called "the political institution of the modern state and Majlis" Or did they eat rations and argue in the press that the planning of a member of parliament is better than the traditional economy of their past? Or is it better than the decisions of Kadkhoda or Khan and is trusted by them and for the villages, or is the work of an employee of their family planning and budgeting organization more fair It is more than the former Kodkhodas, but it does not have the same employees and the air of the serfs, while the old houses in the countryside of Iran and the behavior is more humane with the peasants. Is it traditional in their past? Either it is better than the decisions made by the Kodkhoda or Khan, who are trusted by them and for the villages, or the work of an employee of their family planning and budgeting organization is better and fairer than the former Kodkhodas, but he does not have the same employee and the air of a vassal, while the old Khans of rural Iran have a more humane attitude towards the peasants. or behavior Is it traditional in their past? Either it is better than the decisions made by the Kodkhoda or Khan, who are trusted by them and for the villages, or the work of an employee of their family planning and budgeting organization is better and fairer than the former Kodkhodas, but he does not have the same employee and the air of a vassal, while the old Khans of rural Iran have a more humane attitude towards the peasants. or behavior It is better than the behavior of the village councils or the current city councils, which waste people's money and constantly take and waste taxes or city fees, or constantly prepare an oppressive city budget, and then increase the price of goods and buy and sell them in the city's fruit and vegetable market and make everything expensive and inflated. They create severe problems in the society or throw the wasteful expenses of the municipalities into the pockets of Iranians, while the policy of the "old regional administration" and the city was not so unjust, or the behavior of the heads of the old clans and the people of the cities and rural areas of Iran was not so cruel. It was better than the behavior of the mayors or the members of the current city council, who are not of the same blood and are not the inhabitants of those villages, and the spending is cruel and for that, they are serfs. Do they make you miserable? Or do they shave for his unfortunate family? "And while the old or former heads of the guilds of the cities and the neighbors were the same residents of those kinds of urban neighborhoods, and when they saw that their neighbor's child was unemployed, they rushed to help him out of the sympathy of the citizenry, or because of his neighborhood and in different ways. He helped or helped the poor and disabled people of Muzboro neighborhood, and like the current members of the parliament or like the members of the city council or the village council, they did not say what does it have to do with me? Sell and make money so that I can get city tax money! Or should I get money from him for the expensive furniture of the municipal building or the city council and the assembly? And a kind of corrupt system that the British brought to Asian cities as democracy and democracy or council democracy or popularized the administration, so they changed the administrative behavior so that everyone and for their money Bringing bread to prostitution and extreme poverty, and journalists promote this type of model, or do they say that the model is better than the previous political model, and only livelihood or economy eat and die and make all people worse than the past? And because unlike the past and because none of the members of the parliament care about the misery of the people! In addition, in the formulation of the country's budgeting, the British advisers from the Qajar period have been taught anti-people administrative language to train the people to be special and kind to all kinds of poverty, so they do not know about the misery of the budget of all kinds of families or the problems of Iran's farms, villages and villages. What kind of behavior does poverty have with people? Or what is he doing with the people in terms of treatment and treatment and expensive travel expenses? Or managers who have fake university degrees and how they behave with people, or managers who are so ignorant because of the illusion of that type of fake degree that they don't know that poverty reigns over the inhabitants of 66 thousand Iranian villages. And what is it? Or what is the poverty that governs the budget of Iranian households? Or what will the ruling poverty do to housing rent and the cost of building repairs in thousands of Iranian urban neighborhoods? And why is the institution of parliament, which is an invention of the British, or a gift and invention of the British to the people of Asia, and it leads the people of the world to poverty? It dragged on and it is not clear what he is doing to the people of this great Asian continent? It is a kind of alien political theory of English that the decision-making representatives for the economy have prepared under them, or the representatives who are not of the same blood or race as their clients, and it is only one type: making the government of pharaohs by TV announcers, which is from the institution Parliament or the government in Asia are popularizing the members of the government or the parliament to meet the rational demands of the people and create a kind of pharaoh, and the leader or the two elements are "ruled by gods" or "ruled by slaves" and on television they promote God in such a way that those two people Do they have a "human difference" with each other? Wiki and the genus of gods are holy and people should give it "ministry totem" and holy respect! His ministers were from the Egyptian gods and he has an idolatrous pharaoh government without accountability, but he is always praiseworthy with all kinds of poems and praises, and in addition, all his administrative actions cannot be criticized, and only his administrative behavior is praiseworthy, so he is always praised by the media and reporters, and besides, he is innocent. And do they have it in their ministry, or is it not possible to change it because of their own political mistakes, and maybe they will be replaced, and the situation of the people will improve? Or in the parliament and change the approvals that the political theory of the British and for the globalization of the economy is "building an idol state" or in the theory of globalization, they and the "miserable Asian rulers" are a group of slaves without rights and only by gender. Are non-human slaves that can be killed or bought and sold or enslaved? Or he lacked citizenship rights, or lacked salary, or "lacked salary." Are there "little" prosperity or "ruled ones" who can be bought and sold and how many managers are there in the stock exchange room or are there in the central bank's transactions that with its decisions how many oligarchy managers and all their property should be taken out of their hands? Or be kicked out of their house! Or the model of vote of confidence in the same economic minister because he is not afraid of being fired when economic oppression is inflicted on the people? Therefore, this type of consecration of the state and the pharaohs of the government happens through the parliament, such as the vote of confidence and the right to question or the right to impeach the Egyptian priests, and in the case of "the government modeled by the pharaohs", or by giving a vote of confidence to the minister of health, who cares about the treatment of people with fair money and cost. It doesn't mean that the ministry is not responsible and in front of its own voters, or it doesn't care about treatment and cheap hospitals, and it doesn't care about the treatment and treatment of clients, but it is strengthened by the vote of confidence of the parliament, or the Ministry of Housing is also like this, and for the people who have to pay millions of tomans for housing rent and the promise of "God-like ministry" "He said, but none of his employees know that the buildings in Iran cannot be mortgaged or rented because they are expensive, or people have to pay expensive rents for sleeping in a house for a few nights? Viya Viya Minister Or is the political understanding of the past different? In the past history, such illogical interactions between the government and the people, or unfair interactions between the "ruler and political judge" did not exist in Asia, or did not exist in previous governments, or did not exist in the past 3200 years!
Zanjan and the influence of Qajar rulers
For the sake of Afshar people of Zanjan province
( Transformation of ownership and government in Zanjan )
(Part II)
Research by: Dr. Mohammad Khaleghi Moghadam
Specialization: Anthropologist of Asian peoples
and rural sociologist
or the rulers of Qajar and in a short period of time they set up a system in which all the villagers of the said villages were from the poor tribe of Afshar, so the following documentary documents speak for themselves hundreds of political points, or does it not need to be explained further how it happened? Or is this type of usurpation Were the properties of the unfortunate Iranian peoples or all their means of livelihood taken from them? Or how, through the Qajar people, this way of behavior became popular among the later governments of Asia, which was called contemporary state capitalism, and in addition, the same irrational political way of the Qajar rulers, and then with new methods and the teachings of Stalin and Mao, or to other societies It was found and caused them to learn from the corrupt Qajar government, or to learn the new coercive political model of land grabbing, or the result of the shameful approvals of the corrupt Iranian constitutional assembly, or they learned 30-40 years later, or as the sanctity of capitalism. Didn't Iranians want democracy? Vala, as a zealous and lonely Qajar man, didn't he sell the country? Or did he not make it easier in the agreement that the theology professors or teachers of Sepahsalart school in Tehran would forget him, or they still don't want to know that this kind of disgraceful act of his is condemned by the Qur'an, so they can't teach theology in that place? Or the travel book of Mirza Ali Asghar I am the head of the field and he writes about the owners of Zanjan villages: He does not write with which money, or with which hard work, or with paternal inheritance, which Qajars and those types of villages had acquired Zanjan? For example, on the same page, he writes that "Hossein Abad Village" belongs to Muzaffar al-Sultaneh, and in addition, he writes that "Sarmsaqlo Village, Zanjan" or "Yengjah Zanjan Village" is also the property of Mushir al-Mamalek, and he also writes that "Sohrin Village, Zanjan" belongs to Muzaffar. Al-Dawlah was considered or he writes that "the villages of Mohamad, Kanavand, Koze Bar village, or Bagloja village, Zanjan, or Qeshlaq village, and "Ten Qara Cheryan" or "Ten Cairo", Zanjan, or "Ten Armaghanakhane" or "Ten Dusaran" or "Abadi Jalil" Abad" and "Bagh Village" or "Uch Balag Village" or "Jorah Khan Village" or "Oghan Village" or "Saif Abad Village" and "Hossein Abad Village" or "Beh Vahl Village" or And fight until the land of Iran is freed, or the foreigners and their supporting countries are evacuated, and unfortunately, during these great and bloody wars, many people were killed, or, according to historical sources, thousands of heads of the Afshar tribe were killed, or members of different clans of the Afshar people of Iran were killed. Either they were removed by injury and again the British became greedy, or they tried to make the Qajar tribe the head of the Iranian government instead of other and great Iranian ethnic groups, and the only corrupt family, or they put them at the head of the government, which were not accepted by other Iranian ethnic groups, and even the Turkmens of Golestan and Mazandaran provinces. They hated them too, and in addition, the British tried to eliminate the rest of the Iranian Afshar tribes and again in the thirty-year wars between Iran and Russia, as well as hundreds of Afshar Khans, and were killed? But the cowardly Qajar people had fought in the wars between Iran and Russia and in the hole of the mouse, so only the chiefs of Afshar clans were in Zanjan or neighboring provinces. Or about 23,000 inhabitants of Pushari or adventurers of Zanjan were killed and so after the period of Naser al-Din Shah Qajar and the way of Qajar was paved, so with the removal or killing of most of the heads of the Afshar clans and the entire villages of Zanjan, it was taken over by the aggressive and bloody Qajar or the facilities of the cities. The surrounding areas were usurped, or the ownership of the caravanserais or mosques in Zanjan were all found a new owner, or all of them were owned by the corrupt Qajar Khans, and therefore the poor and poor peasants of this type of Khamsa villages in Zanjan became destitute, or they were considered as helpless slaves, or they were bought and sold along with the lands of their villages. They were located or they were owned by other Qajar khans along with the sale of their villages. It was with this political trick that the ethnic identity of Zanjan province was changed or destroyed, or because of their extreme adventure and deep naivety, they were the first Iranian people to lose their Afshari identity! Or did they make themselves slaves of the Qajar tribe! Or by the force of the gun and the advertisements of the printing houses, they all lost their ethnic identity! Later, he took Qajar and this type of deidentification to other Iranian ethnic groups, and this is the reason why most of the historical sources do not mention the identity of Zanjan people in travelogues, or in all historical sources or in travelogues of this historical period, and only by the name of the owners. The Qajars are arguing in the villages of Zanjan! Or they write about the names of the new Qajar owners of the caravanserais in Zanjan, Bahar, etc. And the old history of Zanjan will also be deleted! Or they teach about the villages of Zanjan and its cities! But don't they refer to different historical sources? And he has judged only with his gift books that he gave as a gift to the National Library or is their intellectual support, as he says in his quote or in the introduction of his book that he had donated tens of thousands of volumes to his library or had sent them there for the establishment of the National Library of Iran. And I am forced to mention the history again in order to express the oppression of the inhabitants of the poor villages of Zanjan, or in order not to be deceived by most students of geography or history of Iran! Or don't eat the trending political contents of Daralfanun books! Finally, I will leave the judgment to the understanding of the readers of the article, who will ask, how did the Qajar tribe have so much agricultural land in another province of Iran, which was not their habitat? Or by what method or political trick did they become owners? Or did they own all these many villages? Or the Qajar clan who were not residents of Zanjan province, but how or by what political trick did they become owners in the shortest possible time? The villages of the Afshari tribe, which were opposed to the Qajar tribe, and this is the reason why Agha Muhammad Khan Qajar and the tomb of Nadir Shah Afshar were torn apart in Mashhad and his body was dragged out for the crime of having buried Ibrahim Shah Afshar or Nader Shah's nephew, Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar. Was? And this matter is mentioned in the documented historical books of the Zandiya era, and for this reason, Karim Khan Zand had not castrated Waqa Muhammad Khan Qajar, which is a kind of historical lie, and another reason is the conflict between Afshar and Qajar.
+ نوشته شده در پنجشنبه نهم شهریور ۱۴۰۲ ساعت ۱۱:۵۲ ق.ظ توسط دکتر محمد خالقی مقدم
|
این وبلاگ شامل :