Zoroastrian jurisprudence of the Sasanian peasantry and its difference with the contemporary Iranian capitalist system

(Transformation of ownership and religion of Iranians)

(Part 1)

From: Dr. Mohammad Khaleghi Moghadam

Specialization - legal sociologist

Reforming the administrative function of the Ministers, unfortunately, the British and heresy created in its old organization, or for their own economic influence in Iran and they were against the old court of appeals and its former Islamic contracts, and for this reason, they ordered their western supporters in this ministry to replace the "former legitimate court" and this Build a new Ministry of Economy, or Customs, Chamber of Commerce, Privatization Chamber, Central Bank, Money and Credit Council, Planning and Budget Organization, Economic Commission and Parliament Integration, and manage them according to the wishes of the Westerners, while many of the new approvals of their employees or the management of those economic bodies and Quranic verses Most of the time, it is considered "modernity's forbidden decrees and decrees", but "the functioning of the old court of appeals of Iranians was not like that!" Therefore, formerly "legitimate social or administrative institutions" And it also refers to the new age of livelihood, but apart from these 8 governorates, the 12 old ministries mentioned by Iranians and the rest of Iran's contemporary ministries do not have an existential necessity for "the survival of enterprises, nor do they have them for economic stabilization or productivity"! Therefore, with the globalization of capitalism and their functional necessity It is already finished and the texts of Quran or Avesta do not have the obligation to obey, and besides, they cannot establish the "legal texts of ownership" or be useful for the "contemporary life of Iranians" or during the previous 2800 years there was no Iranian life! And only with the discretion of the Belgian, Swedish, German, British, American advisors in the new Iran, they have come to build a "new capitalist living system" in Iran! Or to the Iranians and their new way of life in the last 150 years and they have been accepted and their historical mission is over! Among them is the English Ministry of Telegraph House, Telephone and Mobile, which was founded in the era of Nasseruddin Shah and was recommended to the Iranians, or it was the "Ministry of Agriculture, Falahat School and Agricultural Bank", which was recommended by the British and in the years 1309 or 1312 of the era of Reza Shah, which was prescribed to the administrative livelihood of Iranians. Renovation of agricultural tools or methods and its organizations, and nowadays this type of "renewal of agricultural industry" has been done in Iran's agricultural enterprises, and there is no need for employees and its organizations anymore! Or is it the "Ministry of Health and Medicine" which was adopted in 1321 for the promotion of new private hospitals, and it is no longer needed today! Just as in the period of El Boyeh, Azdi Hospital in Shiraz or Azdi Hospital in Baghdad, without the existence of such a ministry, it was running well, or in the Diwans. In the era of Dilmian, there was no "Hospital Court" and only 8 "State Courts". Or did he work with the same high-cost employees, or he did the demanding bureaucracy with golden signatures! And the situation of "medical economic enterprises" is also the same, or the subsets of 9 other ministries are also like this, and the economic enterprise of 1100 hospitals of the Ministry of Health is the same, or the management of tens of thousands of urban pharmacy enterprises, or thousands of therapeutic laboratories in cities, or dental surgery enterprises of cities, and the Ministry of Health and its managers and employees. They are no longer needed or they are no longer needed in the age of capitalism! Or thousands of poultry companies "affiliated to the Ministry of Agriculture" or animal husbandry or greenhouse companies or fish farming companies and the managers of the Ministry of Agriculture are needed! Therefore, their new status can be deferred to the licensing system of the Ministry of Economy and in addition to the "Ministry of Sports". This is also the case and the administration and organization of thousands of sports halls or the economic administration of stadiums or sports companies have been privatized and the managers of the Ministry of Sports and Youth are no longer needed. The era of Pahlavi dates back to when the "Sports Organization" was established! In addition, the administration of dozens of privatized hotel companies is the same as the "Ministry of Tourism"! Or the management of dozens of traditional tourism restaurants or tourism agencies, which were created by the "Tourist Organization" in the Pahlavi II era and in 1342, and can be transferred to the same "authorization system of the Ministry of Economy" in the era of capitalism. In addition, the organization of people's electricity and water production companies or electricity and water joint-stock companies and their plants, which came into being with the birth of the Ministry of Water and Electricity in 1342 AH, and in the new era of economic livelihood, they no longer need the personnel of the Ministry of Energy, and the business system should be fixed. The needs of the Ministry of Economy should be postponed! Or the administration of mortgages and leases or the purchase and sale of houses and the administration of companies of construction complexes or partners in construction or housing, housing, or housing, national measures are taken from the hands of the managers of the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, with the supervision of the courts and the supervision of Islamic contracts, and should be transferred to the Internet systems of the Ministry of Economy. The administrative organization or bureaucracy has dissolved this type of non-functioning ministry, and urban planning or accounting for the technical design of new neighborhood constructions has made its way to the private company of supervising engineers "urban construction and design". It is the same with the privatization of the economic enterprises of universities and higher schools, or with the establishment of knowledge-based companies and other philosophy approved by the Ministry of Science in 1342. And its useless administrative organizations and the problem of 5 million students and 101 thousand academic staffs or those kinds of private scientific institutions are in trouble in the "capitalist era"! And in addition, the "road ministry" is the same as the "road ministry" garage office! Or the transportation department, or city or intercity passenger transportation, or railway, or shipping, or an airline company that is in charge of the "Ministry of Roads" and approved in 1336 in Iran. "In the middle of the Islamic Republic, it was merged with the Ministry of Urban Development, and it is like the useless work of 10 other ministries! And their administrative necessity with the beginning of the era of privatization and the development of private companies has decreased and the livelihood of the capitalist era is meaningless anymore! Or for the sustainability and stabilization of Iranian companies, there is no need for the existence of such unnecessary ministries anymore! For this reason, there is a need to "restructure the government" or "renew" The body of the state" and "the new institutionalization of the state" and the poverty and unhappiness of the Iranian people will disappear or disappear in the era of capitalist livelihood! Either investment security has been created for the people! Or the improvement of the people's livelihood has been improved, or it has been carried out by the same 8 old ministries of Iran, which have their roots in the religious institutions of Iranians and cannot be solved by "administrative modernity"! The "capitalist society" thesis does not say that it is systematized by western telecommunication companies, but it is not accompanied by the growth of the "industrial, technical and scientific productive stratum of the society" which today puts dozens of social strata in trouble, but in " The optimal task of banking those capitals has been transformed, but the unnecessary administrative bureaucracy does not allow the Iranian people to think rationally administratively and enter the era of "state industrial capitalism", and therefore it has hindered the improvement of their new industrial businesses. Rao is looking for "new riots"! It will lead to the closure of thousands of economic enterprises, the newly established private printing house in hundreds of Iranian cities! Or it will lead to the stagnation of a few thousands of local or national press that has thousands of writers or writers! Or the stagnation of the activity of several thousand booksellers or publishers and libraries that are under the supervision of the "Ministry of Guidance"! Or tens of thousands of cinema halls or theaters and cultural centers or private art schools and thousands of graduates of art schools under the supervision of the "Ministry of Culture and Arts" They were formed during the second Pahlavi era, but during the years of the Ahmadinejad government, they were merged with the Ministry of Industries and Mines of Iran, and while all these economic enterprises lacked income and mechanism and were not Iranians in the "past agricultural livelihood civilization", they exist today, or in the shadow of the wrong policies of the aforementioned ministries. have taken! But they are unable to regulate the income and expenses of their new business! Or they are incapable of regulating the income and expenses of their scientific or artistic company, or of their sports company, medical company, or transportation company! But the functioning of income and expenditure of livelihood of 3 agricultural enterprises of the past was not like this, nor was the income and expenditure of the traditional trade or road management company of the past agricultural civilization of Iranians, and so on! Or in the shadow of the tact and wisdom of the scribes of the 8th Diwan of the Iranians, it was not like that! Or were they suffering from such "shortage of agricultural or garden livelihood"! In addition, they did well in adjusting the income and expenses of their "traditional production company"! Or did Iranians do it in the past economy! Or this type of successful economic growth was done in the shadow of "Zoroastrian jurisprudence of 1300" and it was done successfully in the shadow of Islamic jurisprudence of 1450 years ago, and only in the last 30 years, the privatization of Iran has become cramped! But as I said in my previous article, it was solved in Hanafi Islamic jurisprudence during the period of Mansur Caliph Abbasi! Either the legal system of correct ownership of buying and selling, leasing, farming and horticulture of the past "agricultural life of Iranians" was solved, or it was changed in favor of urban farmers and artisans and based on the texts of the Qur'an! Two-thirds of the legal verses of the Qur'an are related to property transactions, sex transactions, buying work tools, or buying livelihood services! It is true that the privatization department of the Ministry of Economy of Iran is not able to manage it correctly, but in the past eras, the clerks of the Court of Appeal of Iran were like that! And this is despite the fact that two-thirds of the verses of the Qur'an are legal provisions that are legally binding for the employees of the Ministry of Economy, and only one-third of the verses of the Qur'an are about the ethics of livelihood, which do not have a judicial-government obligation, or the religious verses of prayer, worship, and hajj, and therefore the Sharia of everything. said, but the employees of the Iran Privatization Administration are unable to understand its legal aspects! For example, according to the book Majamal Fasihi, who writes in the first volume of his book and documents that: Abu Hanifa was introduced to Mansour Abbasi to solve the economic crisis in the mentioned period with his own expert opinions, who was previously a Zoroastrian who had a jurisprudence from the book "Avesta" or " The principles of Avesta jurisprudenceOf course, Islamic contracts and the Qur'anAnd it is not exclusive to Islam, but it exists in "other religions" and in addition, there are similar legal verses of the Qur'an in the religious books of the Christian Bible, the "Zoroastrian Avesta" and the "Jewish Torah", and the administrative courts of those societies also have that jurisprudence. Christians or Zoroastrian jurisprudence acted and managed the labor rights or real estate rights of the movable and immovable property of their society well or according to the text of the mentioned religious books! Or the administrative courts of Zoroastrian, Sasanian, Parthian, Achaemenid, or Medes governments were like this, or they were like this during 1300 years and they were all "special legal system" It is only possible in this way and it does not make it difficult for me to endanger the livelihood of capitalism or the correct bank loan system or to create problems for the maintenance of industrial and employment-creating enterprises, and also without acting like the economy of China or Russia, which "proprietary or small Bourgeoisie" is removed, which does not exist in Islam, and I have mentioned it in the legal texts of my previous article and in the definition of Islam, ownership, its methods and its points. It is also different from "Goldquist economy of global capitalism"! But in order to get it off the ground, it only needs the surgery of the new ministries of the same society, which is followed by the contemporary trade union movement or the productive and chanting movement in the streets of Europe and they demand it! The method worked! or in Mesopotamia agricultural lands and that method of "land ownership" They called it, but they were not scientifically aware of the mechanism of the Asian production method, so they condemned the serfs in the name of private property, or they were not aware of the "agricultural production tools" of this Asian production method! And while this "ownership method of the Asian model" did not consider the Iranian serf as the big owner and only gave him the "right to usufruct" from the land or the irrigation system, or gave us the usufruct of the work tools and residential property of the village, or the benefits of dividing the work of the groups. He gave him the work of agricultural planning or the agricultural design of the countryside, which he had determined by the sacred verses of Avesta, or this type of religious work that "Avesta" It was given to Iranian farmers and many of their livelihood problems were solved, but now in the era of privatization in the 21st century, it is not solved, or the shareholders of the economic enterprises of the public joint-stock company do not have those benefits, or the members of the 6 industrial companies, joint ventures, cooperatives, and mixed companies do not have them. They have taken equity participation loans and facilities from the state bank, but they have faced impasses in the privatization of their company or in the new era, and in this way, they have created a type of loss-making enterprises, while the profitability and performance of the agricultural enterprises in the previous villages Iran and they were not like that! Or they were called by the name of the former village or 66 thousand units of the previous villages and they were not like that! And all of them were productive or job creators for their inhabitants! It was mentioned that the legal commitment of all kinds of agricultural or technical contracts was guaranteed by heaven, or it was found only by the orders of heavenly religions and the legal legitimacy of both sides, and it was not inviolable by the approval of the new parliament! Therefore, in this legal system, the transfer of private property is regulated by the Ministry of Economy's Privatization Department, and in addition, the government's military officer, or the Tax Department of the Ministry of Economy's or the Privatization Department, and the administrative decision has been limited, so he is forced to respect the rights of the citizen of the small owner and the Privatization Department. And the contracts are made or they are in "assignments" and also in the religion of Islam, there are such as Avesta orders, or there are contracts for the assignment of real estate, agriculture, animal husbandry, technical, medical, and sports, or with the text of "Afwa al-Aqud" There is that it is the order of God or it is a collective order and it is said with an imperative verb, or it is a collective order of God to all officials, or in Islamic jurisprudence, the observance or non-observance of said contracts, and "bilateral judicial and Shariah consideration" or in the implementation Its executive steps have been given to all judges and all government officials and collective sharia orders, which Hafez decreed to be mutually exclusive! And don't just unilaterally favor the government officials or the owner! which is in the text of the verses of the Qur'an and the book of Avesta and in both books, or in the execution of agricultural contracts related to the wages of workers or employers, and did not judge unilaterally, or in the execution of contracts between individuals, or in the courtroom, in the police station, or in the tax office, and such an order They should not accept one-sided rights and they should observe the two-way divine commitment or pay attention to all kinds of contracts and transactions, but in today's banking contracts between individuals in our society, there is no such commitment! Or in contracts between companies or in "contracts between It is not "banks" or it is not in the contracts between the government and our nation today, or this type of "legal and religious commitment" is not two-way! Or in our modern industrial livelihood, to the detriment of the "and popularized" productive class. The legal content of the agricultural civilization of Asians has been renewed and continued! And the agricultural livelihood contained in the book "Owner and Minister" by Mrs. Lambton, or in other books of rural sociology of Iran that exist, is also one of the Iranian branches of this "Asian method of production of ownership". And it was the land of Iran that its legal and cultural manifestations of coercion evolved in the thoughts of Iranians, or it found its social use in most of the 66,000 villages of present-day Iran, and in addition, their social production style continued until the year 1342 A.H. And it was changed in the year of Mezbort, and then it was changed with industrial privatization after that date or with the model of Article 44 of the Constitution, which was the proposal of the Westerners, and its production became obsolete, which had many legal defects and ownership style, and it could not replace the legal system of the agricultural civilization before 1342. ! And the "Thesis or Model of Western Industrial Capitalism" And the crisis created poverty in production, and although after 1372, when Article 44 was put into effect in Iran, and even though the number of factories, mines, hospitals, athletes, or universities was added in this historical period, or the number of schools, arcades, and transportation garages increased in Iran. Either the poultry farms or the refineries were increased by the false principle, or they became hundreds of times more than Iran's former by the hands of the employees of 10 ministries after the revolution, or the private jobs of Iran became more and more than before, and it created an unproductive "industrial" system, and in addition, the social stratifications of Iran were also changed, but because of " The "legal and religious" thesis was not strong, so the "theory of capitalism and investment" was unsuccessful! Or the "privatization" thesis was unsuccessful! Or the "capitalist life" thesis was unsuccessful! And because of this legal and theoretical defect and "industrial production surplus" After that, the Iranian revolution did not produce or increase Iran's new technical or scientific production enterprises, nor did it lead to the well-being of the employees of those new enterprises! And in addition, it destroyed their motivation! And in addition, in the last few years And most of the same "industrial and scientific institutions" of modernizing Iran also experienced stagnation of production or severe inflation or lack of exports or lack of liquidity and re-suspension of the nascent economic enterprise, all of which were due to the "deficiency of the legal content of the new industrial livelihood" which He ignored the old agricultural livelihood of Iranians, which was not so meaningless before! And for this reason, it had a livelihood for several thousand years, or it played an essential role in the agricultural production of Asians for several thousand years! In addition, it was due to this legal and religious content of its production forces that the content of the Avesta book or the Qur'an was based on "labor forces". He had given different rights, so that Anan Rao could motivate him to work in production, or make him out of the element of "pure slaves of the farms" and make him a "work force of the owner of Sharia rights in farms and urban factories"! And the acceptance of Zoroastrianism by Iranians or other Asian peoples was for this reason, and then the acceptance of Islam in different parts of Asia and because of the same content of the "rights of productive workers of two heavenly religions" was mentioned, but Western and European industrialization theorists do not accept it or theoreticians The atheistic Marxists of Asia deliberately do not want to accept this feature of labor rights or ownership of the heavenly religions of monotheistic Asians! Or at least understand! Therefore, in the last one hundred years of industrialization in Asia, they are having problems or they are mostly unsuccessful with their hidden theories of atheism and they imagine that "globalization of capitalism" and "polytheistic religion of Satanism" They can manage and advance what has not worked so far and their "non-Asian industrialization thesis" has not been answered! Or the "special method of Asian production" will also give a negative answer to that! In the anthropology faculties or in the legal sociology faculties of religions, the "legal order" of Asian peoples has been done without any difference! And the "future industrial living system of Asia" and the historical continuity of the new productive enterprises of that continent will not show success, nor will it condition the durability of the structures of the political governments belonging to the industrial civilization of Asia, nor the continuity of the administrative organs necessary for such "modern Asian state building" He considers it only dependent on understanding the labor rights of Asian religions! But they don't understand the atheistic Marxism of Mao or Xi Jinping or the ownership theory of Lenin and Putin or the atheist leaders of Central Asia or Eastern Europe or the irreligious kings of the Middle East and this type of " "Religion and government" had a special attitude and the religious conceptualization considers ownership higher than these "human institutions" or did not defer to the program organization or the central bank and its personnel and the rights of the people, which in the modern theories of government and economics in the western society and this type of "economic employees of the government" "And they are all done! Either in the theories of the 18th century Europe, such a wrong theoretical concept of the institution of "government, police and bank" was created! Or it was created in the theoretical courses of European economic faculties and it is given to third world societies, which is not named in the political books of European authors and the theorists of contemporary governments. While in terms of the science of "Cultural and Legal Anthropology" and the Avesta book, it has produced or created a kind of culturalization of "state legitimacy" and the culture of Asian societies that do not ignore the economic rights of the people! Or in the implementation of the Sharia agricultural system, there were various verses in the Avesta that did not destroy the rights of small ownership and the organization of villages! And they gave their religion and various types of wages to the same peasant farmer or tax-paying citizen as "Fadosban" or "Khoreban". Don't destroy the big Sassanid states and their work rights and wages! Or the orders of the governors of Sassanid Tasuj, or the chiefs of small villages, or the tax collectors of the Sassanid Diwans, and Adul did not do justice and religious share, which was the order of all divine religions, so that they do not take more than their royal royal share, or they cannot take the rest of the wages of work or family production of the same farmers or family members. Take them and give them to the government treasury! Or give it to a "special owner" or give it to the construction budget of the Sassanid government planning organization or give it to the Sassanid government's "money and credit council"

Zoroastrian jurisprudence of the Sasanian peasantry and its difference with the contemporary Iranian capitalist system

(Transformation of ownership and religion of Iranians)

(part 2)

From: Dr. Mohammad Khaleghi Moghadam

Specialization - legal sociologist

In this way, he created a change in the institution of the family or ownership of Asian societies and Asian Zoroastrian families and the increase of their welfare, which Fried Rish Engels and his friend Marx could not understand in his book "Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State" or with a wrong theory. To know Asian societies and really understand it in general! And for this reason, he falsified Asian anthropology and did not understand himself with the unknown word "unknown Asian way of life" named by Wazira. The basis for writing the book by Farid Rish Engels is the only knowledge of the property of the primitive red-skinned peoples of Latin America. Uneducated Asian Marxists also make a special joke because of the same book by Engels and Sine, in addition to the said book by Engels or his other book related to the "German Peasant Movement" and all of the books by "Louis Henry Morgan". He was not Henry Morgan, but with the propaganda of illiterate Chinese or Russian Marxists and a lot of media propaganda, and with the brainless television and press advertisements, these types of eastern societies and the facts of the history of Asia and their governments were turned upside down, so today's anthropology does not understand the true meaning of production, livelihood, or government in ancient Asia. Or with the deep superstitions of such people, and in addition, the contemporary governments or the contemporary populist planning parliament have taken sufficient advantage of this type of political superstition and used enough media to justify their decisions and their industrial privatization actions. The brand that has brought the "new capitalist life" to a deep crisis in the vast land of Asia! Therefore, the development of contemporary industrial enterprises is sterile or does not benefit the people, the Minister found the basis of "false epistemology", but the book "Avesta" has various interpretations and defends the "rights of Asian farmers". And he thought that it was because of these Avesta legal verses that the Zoroastrian religion became stronger, or that it found its most prominent religious followers during the Achaemenid Vashkani Empire period and among the people of Asia, who left the "primitive former ethnic religions" and went to the "Avesta religion" They added that there were no such rights for agricultural work, technical work, or Shariah trading in previous elementary religions, and only the Zoroastrian religion and the "human legal system" had provided production and "legal evolution" that Western anthropology schools still do not recognize! Therefore, the legal system of Avesta does not have the only verses related to prayer or fasting, or it is not only "going to the mosque" or going to a "place of Mazda worship" that has only acts of worship, or the word "Avesta mosque" is also in the Qur'an with the word "mosque". Today, the socialist governments of China, North Korea, Belarus, and Kazakhstan believe that if a Chinese worker or an Uzbek worker weaves a homemade basket in his own home with extra work and then sells it in the market, he has violated China's state property rights! He has made extra money for himself and for his extra work or by selling his home handicrafts in the Chinese market and "stealing from the government"! Therefore, he deserves to be punished! And for this reason and the theory of "state ownership of communists" with the denial of people's religious rights and a type of materialism "atheistic ownership" and in the new industrialized states of Asia, and this theory leads to the exploitation of workers, or by denying God, materialism, and the same legal provisions of heavenly religions, he has legislatively denied the rights of the worker and to the detriment of the labor rights of the farmer, worker, and urban industrialist, and negates them all, and in the hands of the members of the People's Assembly It is given by the same countries and the rights that were given to mankind by all divine religions 3800 years ago, and this time Batz and the theory of "materialistic ownership" are taken from the hands of the same Asian workers and become part of the legislative rights of the Atheist Assembly of China, Russia, or without Russia! To know the small family gift of a worker to his sister and "religious superstitions"! Or with the approval of their own atheistic socialist government and take it out of the hands of the same "new Chinese and Uzbek worker and forgive his family" and give them to their revolutionary government or allocate them to buy government weapons and that's it. that Ostam's book had been proposed or given to the old farmers of Asia, but in the last 200 years and labor movements of European industries, it has not been given to them! Nor has it been discussed in European law schools! Or it has not been approved in the European parliaments! Not even in the false theory of labor rights of Marxism Volninism or in the writings of the book: He admits that the Qur'an itself is also a heavenly book of religion, and it has content similar to Avesta's verses about the rights of the labor force, the way of trade and the ownership of the labor force! Therefore, it does not deny the rights of farmers or the rights of urban artisans, and in this regard, there are many verses that I have mentioned in my previous article, or I have referred to the property attitude or the rights of labor and friendship in the Qur'an, but the Arabs who in 652 AD and the Sassanid civilization They destroyed or conquered the agricultural lands of 23 nations of the world, and they did not believe in implementing the orders of the Qur'an, or they did not believe in the economic affairs of other nations, or they did not believe in the way of ownership and friendship of other Asian nations, and they simply wanted to take the governorship of other nations in their hands! Or just fill their pockets with the income of the lands of other nations! Although during the 132-year rule of the Umayyads, they made some changes and took tribute from the conquered nations, but none of them followed the Quranic instructions or applied it in the "Reference Jurisprudence of the Umayyad Nation" and the agricultural land tenure system, until in the year 132 AH and became extinct! And the Abbasid government had lost its identity among the Arabs and Arabs and forced the Turks into the army in Baghdad, and in addition, they brought other Iranian or Asian Turks into their Abbasid court as administrative clerks or judges or as authors, until during their period. Hanafi, Shafi'i, and Hanbali Islamic jurisprudence grew in the hands of other Asian nations in Baghdad, or it was made by inferring jurisprudence from the Qur'anic verses and "legal foundation" or it was Arabic grammar by means of "Iranian siboye". On page 99 of the same book, he mentions the killing of some peasants of the mentioned settlements, and on page 27 of the same book, he mentions the words "peasant of Qasiyyah Babil" or "peasant of Aal Abadi" or "peasant of Falalij village" or "peasant of Nahr al-Mulk" and He mentions "Dehqan of the village "Deskra" or "Dehqan of Bisheh Subit" on page 126, and also calls the heads of those agricultural villages in the same book as "Kadkhoda" which was an Iranian word and assumed on page 55 of the book Fatuh al-Baldan and "Kadkhodayan" He mentions the villages of "Baduria" and "Qatarbel" and "Nahr Boq" and "Nharbin" in Iraq! In addition, on pages 34 and 35 of the book Fatuh al-Baldan, he mentions the Iranian settlements of "Stina" and the village of "Saanba" and the village of "Hormoz" or the forests and swamp lands of Khosrow and Iraq or the "forest full of trees"