Zanjan Seljuk era Friday market and mosque and its destruction by the Mongols and Amir Kabir (first part) Dr. Mohammad Khaleghi M.
Zanjan Seljuk era Friday market and mosque
and its destruction by the Mongols and Amir Kabir
(first part)
Problems of Islamic capitalism and Asian urban societies
From: Dr. Mohammad Khaleghi Moghadam
Specialization: urban sociologist
And all of them had become baboons, so it was their right that such a calamity should befall them, and even the descendants of those unfortunate victims would not dare to ask them a question about the philosophy of killing their forefathers? And besides, not only the soldiers of the Qajar tribe, who by the order and insistence of the great Amir They would kill and destroy all the houses of the unfortunate people in the 9th to 12th of the month, or they would be surrounded by cannons 24 hours a day, and most of the women would have abortions due to the constant roar of those cannons, and in addition, the Qajar army, and they were equipped with 8000 modern rifles, the son of Mashhad Sir, did the chef ask the British to kill the unfortunate people of the Turkic or Shiite religion of a province? Or kill him at the beginning of his ministry? And some people praise him in their books or write in their letters that he was the great Amir and the greatest reformer of the century? Or should they write in the press and contemporary history schools that no president of the previous centuries of Iran was able to do his work? And what happened to the people of Zanjan in the said historical period? Or what was the reference to the aforementioned 23 thousand unfortunate people? Or to the people who were killed in other cities? Or they were killed under the title of Babi? For example, 2000 people were killed in Niriz, or 2000 people were killed in Barfarosh, or 37 people were killed in Tehran, or in Yazd, Jafabad, Isfahan, etc., which came from the cruelty and violence of the Qajar army. and tell others that the prevalence of the term (companions of the Bab of Imam Zaman) in the anti-Qajar rebellions of the mentioned period and what kind of Quranic roots did it have? Is it due to the complete religious and Quranic illiteracy of his followers, or is it due to the lack of historical and cultural information of the personnel and managers of cultural heritage, who have the right to kill One-sided and in the case of Zanjan they create? Or don't they allow questions to be asked about the oppressed of this Iranian province? Or are they not allowed to file a historical lawsuit? Or the right to raise questions in the press is not given? Or the right to clear doubts to the other side and the public opinion of the society Is it not given? Or is permission to print and speak in the media only for the benefit of oppressors, looters, and historical destroyers? Or writing articles for the press and the university is given only to one side of the dispute! Which is suspicious in the shadow of some concepts and the right of the opposite party should not be lost? Or don't get involved with two-sided religious claims? And Qajaria could not seize the property, honor and lives of the inhabitants of a province or destroy the historical identity of the people of that province! And on the contrary, take the right to question the other party! Although after many years of silence, the publication of the book "The War of Zanjan" by Mr. Parviz Fathullah is very interesting. Domestic and foreign libraries have proposed and discussed! And for the first time, the 170-year-old oppression or the right to kill and to the detriment of the people of Zanjan has been brought up, or it has been brought to public opinion again! Previously, Mahdi Bammad's book, Shahrah Rizal Mahdi, also contained some material or briefly presented it, which was dumb, and because in the past, most of the Iranian press was silent, or the authors of the book in Iran, or the licensers of the Ministry of Guidance, only gave permission to a certain number of people. Think about condemning the other party! So, was it intentionally or unintentionally and in the case of oppression of the people, was Zanjan and short? And for this reason, I would like to point out a religious point and ask Mr. Zarghami to put an end to the administrative and cultural strife of the employees of the cultural heritage department of the province and to defend the Qajar people in Zanjan, who believe that all the cultural heritage of Zanjan belongs to the Qajar people, and criticism is allowed. They will not give way to anyone! And in the shadow of my paintings, you brought them to the market of Zanjan, and over the doors of mosques, caravanserais, and reservoirs of Zanjan, and the real history of Zanjan will be forgotten! And are they merely protecting the interests of the Qajar people in the Cultural Heritage Department, or are they simply trying to discredit or call into question the true history and identity of Zanjan by pasting all kinds of placards on the door of a historical warehouse or on the door of a traditional restaurant in Zanjan? Or apply historical oppression to the same unfortunate class! And they should show Fatalishah's family to the people of Zanjan and vice versa! Or should everyone know the historical heritage of Zanjan and the result of the current actions! And while the historical documents of the cultural heritage of Zanjan are the opposite! And only the cultural heritage personnel of Zanjan and this kind of cultural pride of Zanjan are reversed only for the benefit of the Fatalishah family! Or some shopkeeper in the village of Ten Angoran, Zanjan, had a fight with another cultural heritage worker in Zanjan, and he took a sign from us cultural heritage workers and called it "Bazaar of Ten Angorans Residents of Zanjan" and put it on the wall of the upper market in Zanjan, or they stuck it on the door of his shop and All the passers-by should tell the tourists or literate writers and inculcate culture that the same market above Zanjan was not built during the Seljuk period and was only built by a few immigrants who moved to the city in recent years, who came from "Kore De Angoran Zanjan" or They came to a certain shop in the market, and then they built a market by claiming to sell cucumbers or eggplants in a shop, and that the father of their subjects in Angoran had a lot of money and gave him to build a part of the "Traditional Zanjan Market"! It is only with these paintings that the blood of 23 thousand killed and the misfortune of Zanjani Vankar becomes history! Therefore, Mr. Zarghami or his deputies "must pay cultural attention" and not allow their subordinates to make arbitrary cultural interpretations! And here, in addition to recommending to read the contents of the book "War of Zanjan", I am telling this point to the careless employees of the cultural heritage of Zanjan, and they are accused of being "cultural partners" in the shedding of the blood of 23 thousand unfortunate people of Zanjan during the era of Naseruddin Shah. In addition to their illiteracy of the Qur'an, they still do not know how the people of that time, just by the fatwa of a cleric, took a ruling from Fath Ali Shah and led to the murder of the head of the people of Zanjan. During this period of 170 years, the regime has changed, or the public officials affiliated with both regimes have changed, but the fatwa signs of killing them are still supported by the cultural heritage workers, and the name of Shaykh al-Islami Qajar will not be removed from the long street of the bazaar? To tell everyone that it is still He and Shaykh al-Islam are a whole city! It is good that he issued the fatwa to kill 23 thousand people of Zanjan! And why did the people of Zanjan refuse to pray the Friday prayer behind the appointed priest, Fethlishah Qajar? And don't let them be killed! Or it was a good thing that the people of Zanjan's Juma Mosque were also destroyed! Because they didn't want to pray behind the appointed Imam of Juma, Fath Alisha! Or do they exchange it with the Jame Shaari mosque?! So their only right was to be killed? It is a strange argument that the cultural heritage personnel have Zanjan! In addition to the claim of cultural heritage and the claim of religious authority, they also imitate all the people of the city! Who has the Sharia right or not? And here I am going to quote some historical books and the aforementioned events, including the book Naskh al-Tawarikh or Tarikh Rizal Iran by Mahdi Bammad and others, which have written documents and only over 15 to 18 thousand people of Zanjan and the people of Afshar, armed in Zanjan, and behind the head of Mulla Mohammad. Ali Zanjani prayed, and they did not go to the state Friday prayer of Fatal Shah in Zanjan, or all the people of Zanjan except for the city of Zanjan, and they did not go to the Friday prayer of Fatal Shah, who had a population of only 23,000 in Zanjan at that time, or the people of Zanjan alone and behind the head of the accepted authority. They used to pray the Friday prayer themselves, and there was a person named Mullah Mohammad Zanjani, with whom they prayed the Friday prayer, and he also studied jurisprudence in Karbala! They knew it themselves, and before the establishment of Fatalishah Friday Mosque in Zanjan, he was also their Friday imam, or when he established the Sayyed Sabza Maidan Mosque in 1240 AH under the name of Sayyed Sabzah Maidan, and Fatalishah established it as a government Friday mosque, and before that, the Afshari people of Zanjan and about 70 years behind Mullah Muhammad. Ali Zanjani and his fathers had prayed Friday prayers, which according to the book of Marat al-Buldan, had been renovated since 1173 A.H. and used as the Friday mosque of the Zanjanis during the reign of Karim Khan, or after the murder of Nader Shah. cultural heritage, they didn't know whether Shaykh al-Islami would accept or not the people of Fatah Alisha Rao? But still those Zanjan cultural heritage employees stick the word "Mujtahid" On the street of the house of Mirza Abulqasem Mirzaei or on the street of Seyyed Mohammad Sirdani and all the people of the city, they just condemn that why didn't two people pray behind them so that they wouldn't be killed? Yes, nowadays, whether the people of a city are Muslim or not is also subject to the regulations of Mr. Zarghami's Ministry of Home Affairs. ! Or has it been submitted to the opinion of the minister of guidance that they accept the one who has been accepted by the corrupt Fatalishah and the authority of the Imam of Jamaghi? And while the purpose of Fath Al Shah's conquest and the construction of the State Grand Mosque in Zanjan was not only to spread the Qur'an or religion and the Juma Mosque was built by Fat Al Shah in Zanjan, it was not that people were forced to pray behind the head of a mullah who had given him an imperial decree. The purpose behind Fatalishah's curtain was to build that government mosque of Seyyed Zanjan, or in giving orders to those two government mullahs of Zanjan and the only one, was to destroy the property and honor of the people of Zanjan, or to destroy the lands of the villages of the Afshar people of Zanjan province and other people of Azerbaijan! But the people of Zanjan had their own 40-year bloody experience in the war with the Qajar family, or they had seen Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar in the war by the Karaj river, or they had seen Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar in the war in the Karabagh region, or in the 50 thousand-man expedition of Agha Mohammad Khan Qajar to Zanjan! And they were not willing to accept Imam Juma Fatalishahi! In addition, they had experienced how, with the support of those two clerics of the Qajar government, and how the Russians forced the people of Zanjan! Or the Russians, passing through Zanjan, entered the door of any house they wanted, or during the reign of Fath Alisha and Muhammad Alisha of Qajar. When Kardand or the Russian agents wanted to spend the night in that place and Zanjan's house, they immediately put the Russian flag on the door of the Zanjani's house, and in one of the historical travelogues, it has been mentioned about this topic, and if his neighbors protested, they would be severely beaten. The servants of the same Qajar ruler of Shahr Zanjan were facing each other! In addition, with the support of the same two people, the cleric of the government of Zanjan and the ruler of Zanjan, an individual called "Ashraf Khan Makoi" and the same Qajar ruler, who was part of the family or family of Haji Mirza Aghasi, the Grand Sadr, dared to kidnap a married woman of a Zanjani Muslim member and take her to his house at night and rape her! Afshar Zanjani, who was considered an affront to the entire tribe and their ethnic culture, and keeps him at night in his house, commits adultery! And while this matter is according to the verses of Surah Nisaqran and it is a type of adultery that is forbidden by the ruler of the city! Either he does it with his unfortunate subjects, which is aggravated by the fatwa of the two government mullahs of Zanjan, or with the illegal support of the Mullah Kalbasi of Esfahan, who defended the corrupt Fathlishah, or the same Shaykh al-Islam Zanjani, who received jurisprudential advice from Mullah Kalbasi of Isfahan! And while everyone knew very well or knew or knew that if Hazrat Ali was there, he would have been punished! Or if there was Zanjani instead of Mullah Muhammad, who was considered the sharia ruler of Zanjan, and Ashraf Khan Makoi made adultery a sharia thing! But Akhund Kolbasi and Isfahan Seminary or Mullah Mullah Mohsen Naraghi or the scholars who confirmed the government of Fathalishah Qajar and could they not consider such actions of Fathalishah's appointees in Zanjan as "anti-Qur'an jurisprudential acts"? And while the people of Ghirti Zanjan were part of the Afshar tribe and they had honor zeal, and in addition to accepting the orders of the Quran and Surah Nisa and the honor zeal of the tribe was also part of their ethnic culture, which in their culture was forbidden to violate a member of the tribe and its concept was to violate the honor of all members of the tribe. And in the old culture of their Asian tribes, this type of rape was not done to a woman member of the same tribe, or until the era of the Safavid and Qajar era khans, there was no cultural custom between the Iranian tribes and it was a "non-Asian culture" which was the ruling khans of the urban Qajar and Iranian cities. And when the family of the plaintiffs and those two people approached the government mujtahid, but they refused, and this time they went to their own taqlid authority, or did they go to the time of Muhammad Alisha Qajar and ask for their sharia assignment? He, too, who had learned jurisprudence in Karbala and with the Sharif scholars, and had answered the Zanjani plaintiffs that the said ruler, according to the verses of the Qur'an, committed an act that is forbidden and is permissible according to the law, and the people of the city of Zanjan are also angry and without fear of the many Qajar soldiers and the Qajar government. Zanjan, who had built a square in Sabzeh and had a regiment or a prison and gunners, or Abdullah Mirza was built by Qajar, or he was the 11th son of Fatalishah and built the first Qajar Darul-Hokuma, or he himself and the first Qajar ruler became the same Darul-Hokuma Sabze Zanjan, and the people of Zanjan as well, according to Naskh al-Tawarikh and Ashraf Khan Makwi Or they killed Mohammad Shah Qajar, and this was while after Safaviyyah, Zanjan and Tadoreh were conquered by Alishah. And this exile was repeated or happened once again during the reign of Mohammad Shah Qajar, so this kind of forbidden acts of the corrupt Qajar rulers were repeated in Zanjan or in other Iranian cities, including in the city of Niriz, which led to the death of 2000 people. ! Or the people of Kermanshah who fought with "Mohammed Ali Khan Makoui" in Kermanshah! or clashes in the cities of Khorasan, such as Tarshiz, or in Beshravieh, or such as the conflict with Mullah Mohammad Ali Tarshizi. There was a conflict with 400 clerics who learned lessons in Karbala, and all of them were young clerics from different cities of Iran who had religious conflicts with the imams of Fridays appointed by Fatalishahu in those Iranian cities. Or it was Sheikh Ahmad Ahassai who told them that due to the great oppression of Fatal Shah in Iran, the emergence of the Imam of the Time is near and you should wait for the emergence of the Imam of the Age, and those 400 young clerics of Karbala had also learned the word "Bab of the Imam" from those two teachers. In other words, be "friends of the Imam of the time"! Or you and the tyrannical rulers of the Qajar city and do the best! Therefore, this word was invented in the Qajar era and became popular, or the word "Bab Imam Zaman"–It became the correct Qur'an of the military jurisprudence schools of the Seljuk era, which you derived from the Qur'an and its verses and my inferences, and they did not harm the people of Iranian cities! But it was born in "Maravi Nasser Khosrow School" which was built by "Khan Qajar Marvi" during the reign of Agha Muhammad Khan, or it spread English jurisprudence, or it was popularized in "Sephesalar Qajar Qazvini" religious and jurisprudence school in Tehran, and later it was called the Faculty of Reasonable and Transferable Theology. and then he entered the courses of the Theology Faculty of Tehran University, or was taught by Ali Amini Qajarzadeh, or in "Soltaniye Jurisprudence School Courses" O Lataklo, my possessions are worthless, and the rulers (and the fatwa of usurping the property of an unfortunate Afshari subject of Zanjan) will be removed! ! Or give it in favor of a Qajar khan of that city! And while it was the other way around, and God has mentioned the same city in the Qur'an or in the mentioned verse, and the same Qajar turbaned judge, and "bribery and usurping rulers" in the real jurisprudence of the Qur'an, or the same judge or "the vice-president of Muqo, Fa" in the Qajar era and in the verse "I He has addressed us in the Qur'an, and he should not have judged against the text of the Qur'an and the judgments! Or does it violate the registration of a property deed? Or, in his claim of endowment, he claims that the text of the Qur'an is addressed by an "infidel judge", or he rejects most of its verses and "religious judgments" as non-Sharia, or he considers them as non-Qur'anic judgments, which are explicitly mentioned in dozens of "Qur'anic judgment verses" He has done it, or in the endowment administration of the Qajar era, or in the teaching of jurisprudence. It is and the people of Iran should not talk about the performance of city rulers and religious people! Therefore, the theory of Quranic jurisprudence of Shafi'i, Hanafi, Hanbali, and Maliki had "changed the content of the Quran" after the Safavid era, and the object of religious protest was the same 400 young clerics of Karbala who studied jurisprudence in Karbala, and one of them was Mullah Muhammad Ali Zanjani, who lived in Karbala. And he studied jurisprudence, who believed that the Friday prayer sermon of Iranian cities should be recited "in the name of Imam Zaman Ghaib" instead of Fatalishah! And this religious thesis of theirs also caused the popularization of the word "Bab Imam Zaman" and later caused the killing of all of them! And "Hamid Algar, European" or other Europeans also in the theory of "relationship between religion and government in Iran" and were in favor of this type of legitimacy of Fatalish in Iran, whether they were in favor of holding Friday prayers or interfering in the religious affairs of Iranian citizens. The Seljuk period had created the correct trade based on "real Islamic trade contracts" in the Islamic empire of the Asian Seljuk cities and markets. They were profiting or they were satisfied or they were profiting in the "jurisprudence" of Nizam al-Mulk and commercial profit! Or they would get real agricultural benefits! But they were not useful in the "jurisprudential theory" produced in the Qajar era! For example, they did not benefit from the jurisprudence courses of the Marvi Qajar school, or at the Sepehsalar school, or at the Qajar Soltanieh school, or at the Zanjan Abdullah Mirza Qajar school of jurisprudence, or at the Shahzadegan Darlfunun Qajar school (as well as the relationship between the government and "religion"). ) and the theory was reversed and it was just a reverse interpretation of religion, which in the past caused many riots against Qajar and today it will cause trouble to the commercial and technical companies of Europe and the urban societies of Asia! And just like the Asian city of Zanjan, 170 years ago and the initial foundations of the rise of capitalism in Asia, brought it to an intellectual, political and religious challenge! And later it was also extended to other Iranian cities such as Niriz or Barfrosh, Wizd, Isfahan, Tarshiz, Beshroi, etc., or they were also subject to the jurisprudence theory of Khwaja Nizam al-Mak Tusi, who built the real Juma Mosque in Zanjan, and was the most important political thinker in Asia. In his own era, he was either a political theoretician of the Asian empire who mixed the "religion of Islam" with the "correct policy of state administration" or a type of "great theory of Asian statehood". And he had brought it out, and his goal was to establish the Seljuk Mosque in Zanjan or the Seljuk Bazaar in Zanjan, and the same type of political and religious goal was important, and he himself saw the path of a great Asian president who should settle Asian cities with his religious theory or trade in them. Burn the city! But the same mosque was destroyed by Khwaja Nazam al-Mulk, and it was destroyed twice to destroy his Asian theory! And once it was destroyed by the shamanist Mongols, so that all of Asia, in trade and construction, became "shamanist"! And once again, it was destroyed by the "Amir Kabir Qajar Prime Minister" so that the property of a great Asian nation would be turned over to "the benefit of the corrupt class of the Asian Qajar people" and "aggressive usurpation"! Or vice versa and destroying the same 2700-year-old Asian city is like the city of Zanjan, and their deeds are different from each other! Or in the "understanding of the difference in procedure" and "the difference in theories" of the two great presidents, they were responsible for the founding of Asian governments and each of them built a "special model of the government" that one would develop a city like Zanjan in his own Islamic theory. ! or "good market facilities" and build a city in it, and so on, and in order to establish "his theory, or in the foundation of a corrupt Iranian government" called the "Qajar government", or in order to organize the wrong behavior of his managers, he kills the same government and his Zanjani compatriots, or in An Iranian city kills Barzeg! And the "supporters of the political jurisprudence of Friday prayers" in this Friday mosque, let them be angry and angry! Until they present "another theory of religious citizenship"! And once again, at the beginning of the Mongols' arrival in Iran, the Juma Mosque was destroyed! Or the theoretical gatherers of that Friday mosque were killed and killed to forget the most important jurisprudence lessons of the 16th military of Iran and it was ruined in this regard, or it was ruined in the way of holding the Friday prayer and its religious interpretation, and they accepted the theory of Yasai Genghis Khani and about trade, which in Ghazan era Khan Moghul was left aside, and once again Vamir Kabir and "opposed to that was the political thesis of Nizam al-Mulk", so they destroyed this Juma mosque in Zanjan again, and in my next two articles I will discuss in detail the theories of cultural anthropology and the "political thesis of Asia". On the contrary, Europeans have been spreading it since the Safavid period and contemporary Asian cities and they believe that the religion and text of the Qur'anic instructions should be subject to the interpretation of the government officials of that country! Or to justify the administrative system of the same country! Or should they make a new religion through the Safavid and Qajar governments? Or should the kings of 52 Asian Muslim countries or the presidents of the same 52 Asian governments and they should "make their own religion"? Or create the desired religion of the government of their own era! Or make it in the same Asian country! And let them feed their own people or train their clergy! They only justify the actions of the government rulers of the same country and "anti-Qur'anic justification", and in addition, they justify the government clerics in the Islamic law, in court matters, in endowments, in cultural heritage, in banking, stock market, commercial transactions, and land. Let it be like this, and let the affairs of Islamic farming and mudarabah, insurance, media, pulpit, television, and prayers of the congregation of mosques be such that it is in harmony with their "new religion" and the media will continue! But don't pay attention to the real content of the "commandments of the Qur'an and the Prophet" and this type of "political thesis". Or create the desired religion of the government of their own era! Or make it in the same Asian country! And let them feed their own people or train their clergy! They only justify the actions of the government rulers of the same country and "anti-Qur'anic justification", and in addition, they justify the government clerics in the Islamic law, in court matters, in endowments, in cultural heritage, in banking, stock market, commercial transactions, and land. Let it be like this, and let the affairs of Islamic farming and mudarabah, insurance, media, pulpit, television, and prayers of the congregation of mosques be such that it is in harmony with their "new religion" and the media will continue! But don't pay attention to the real content of the "commandments of the Qur'an and the Prophet" and this type of "political thesis". Or create the desired religion of the government of their own era! Or make it in the same Asian country! And let them feed their own people or train their clergy! They only justify the actions of the government rulers of the same country and "anti-Qur'anic justification", and in addition, they justify the government clerics in the Islamic law, in court matters, in endowments, in cultural heritage, in banking, stock market, commercial transactions, and land. Let it be like this, and let the affairs of Islamic farming and mudarabah, insurance, media, pulpit, television, and prayers of the congregation of mosques be such that it is in harmony with their "new religion" and the media will continue! But don't pay attention to the real content of the "commandments of the Qur'an and the Prophet" and this type of "political thesis". and in addition to the Sharia justification of government clerics and in court matters or in the matter of endowment or in cultural heritage or in banking and stock market affairs and in commercial and land ownership affairs, and in the affairs of Islamic farming and mudaraba, insurance and media, pulpit and television, and congregational prayer in mosques, and in the case of "new religion" They "must have continuous media coverage! But don't pay attention to the real content of the "commandments of the Qur'an and the Prophet" and this type of "political thesis". and in addition to the Sharia justification of government clerics and in court matters or in the matter of endowment or in cultural heritage or in banking and stock market affairs and in commercial and land ownership affairs, and in the affairs of Islamic farming and mudaraba, insurance and media, pulpit and television, and congregational prayer in mosques, and in the case of "new religion" They "must have continuous media coverage! But don't pay attention to the real content of the "commandments of the Qur'an and the Prophet" and this type of "political thesis".–Or the non-Sharia actions of Allahvardi Khan of Armenia and Shirazara, or Gorgin Khan of Georgia and Kandahar, or the actions of the Darvish rulers of Zanganeh, the ministers of the Safavid kings, and the rulers of Iranian cities, should be justified by Sharia! Or the non-Sharia actions of endowment employees or their Sharia court, or the acts of usurpation of land by the rulers of the Safavid kings, who regularly used to confiscate and confiscate the properties of the Rao tribes, or they are contrary to the text of the Qur'an and Sharia justification, and it was like this in the Qajar period, or did such a practice continue or continue. That field of study also took place in Isfahan's Kolbasi school, which had taken the place of Isfahan's Chahar Bagh jurisprudence school of Sultan Hossein, and they did disgraceful acts of Qajar agents and killed the people of Zanjan, and defended the pulpit or preached, which was not common in Shafi'i jurisprudence during the Seljuk era! There was no such religious justification in the "Neo Hanafi Jurisprudence" of the urban rulers of the Timurid era! Nor was it common for the actions of civil servants and city officials and the children of Timur Lang! which shows the "difference of jurisprudence" between these two historical periods in Asia, and in the same historical period in Egypt, this type of "English jurisprudence" used as a tool for Islam became popular either by the Egyptian government officials or by the same members of the East India Company and entered the field of Egyptian jurisprudence. "The Muslim Brotherhood of Al-Azhar University in Egypt, which the great ambassador of England named Harding in Egypt has mentioned in his book, or he entered Iraq through the seminary of Jebel Amel in Lebanon and Syria, or he entered the seminary of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia in the same historical period, which is "Salem Jurisprudence Leave the old Maliki of Saudi Arabia! And give a new interpretation of Islam to justify the actions of the employees of Saudi Arabia, UAE and Bahrain! Or he entered the jurisprudence of Karachi and Lahore, Pakistan, or he entered the seminary of the Muslim League of Pakistan, Kashmir and Bangladesh, or he entered the seminary of Kabul, Afghanistan, he became a Taliban, or he entered the jurisprudence of Estan Nabul and Ankara, to justify the illegal actions of the Adalat party and the development of Erdogan, and to justify the sharia or new democracy. ! Or in Indonesia, Malaysia, and 52 Muslim countries in Asia as well, and it became popular as a "new field of jurisprudence" (which spread the theory of Asian quasi-Islamic capitalism! But it was alien to the texts of the Koran, but the ideology of usurious banking or gambling stock market It makes these Asian countries culturally mixed with Quranic verses, which has created a strange mixture of "modernization of Islam" and "the rise of Asia's capitalism" or with the "old religion of healthy Asian land-owning civilization". And there is only one type of sterile political thesis that cannot grow and grow in the soil of Asia or among the hungry people of that continent, and it is only done as a tool and in the government offices of Asia and used as a tool for propaganda and to justify the administrative and banking corruption of the corrupt employees of 52 Islamic countries! Or only the reputation of the quasi-Islamic parties will take away the justice and development of Turkey! Vietnam will take away the reputation of the Muslim party like Pakistan, or the reputation of the pseudo-Alawi party of Bashar al-Assad of Syria, or the reputation of the Islamic Party of Iraq, or the Islamic Ennahda Party of Tunisia, or its Islamic sisters in Indonesia and Malaysia, who ignore the teachings of the Qur'an and the Prophet. But they look at the "religion of Islam" as a "tool"! Or they don't really believe in the religion of Islam and in Asia, while " Different types of this type of clerics have created a strange and strange concoction of Islam and Asia, and they can't overcome poverty or high cost and vast injustice with their quasi-Sharia justifications! who impose on the people of Asia and make it believable that the people do not resist! Therefore, the foundations of the initial sparks of this type of "religious resistance" against the pseudo-religious civilization of Amir Kabir happened 170 years ago or were laid in Karbala jurisprudence and about 800 young students of Karbala jurisprudence joined that theory and for the first time "Derivation of Qur'anic jurisprudence" was found in Karbala area during the period of Muhammad Shah Qajar and then it was extended to the area of jurisprudence of Mulla Mohammad Zanjani school and other cities! And it was like the Ismaili movement of old and it still has different intellectual and reasoning supporters, or in this regard, unlike the religious sphere of Isfahan and other jurisprudential spheres of Iran and the "Friday Mosque of Afshar Yaznjan" The revelations of jurisprudence were made again by him, who was a new "Sheikh Hasan Juri", or he found many students, who was exiled again by Pepram Khani, an Armenian, or an envoy from the Qajar court. The obligation of Friday prayer in cities is invalid, or it is not among the rights of Iranian kings! Or even if Friday prayer is held! And the sermon named Fatalishah should not be recited! On the contrary, it should be recited in the name of the Imam of the Time and the Friday prayer sermon or read in the Friday mosque in Zanjan, Tehran, Isfahan, etc., so that by reciting the said sermon, employees will not be promised and commit forbidden acts in government offices! Or in the name of the Qajar kings and Qajar rulers, do not spread oppression and violence in the cities, or do not train a wrongful government official in not fulfilling the promise of the Qur'an, even if, in the same era, Shaykh al-Islam and Imam Juma, the appointed Fatalishah, and those kinds of actions of government officials are not considered usurpation?! Yes, today the era of the Qajar regime has been abolished or ended, but it is still in the cultural heritage of Zanjan and now, and it has become the insistence of the current cultural heritage workers to say that because 23 thousand people of Zanjan and the 48 fortifications of Zanjan were collectively disbelieved in the rain cannon incidents and while Historical documents and vice versa show that they were constantly shouting or chanting (or the Imam of the time) and therefore they are not considered to be infidels or (Babies of the Baha'i model)! Or is the shedding of their blood not considered Shariah according to Mirza Abul Qasim's fatwa? But Mirza Abul Qasim who ordered the killing of most of the people of Zanjan Rao and then ordered that most of their corpses be thrown into the ditches in the south of Zanjan city, and in the eyes of these employees, the cultural heritage is considered a type of Shaykh al-Islam! And while at the same time, the soldiers of Iran's Muslim regiments refused to kill them, or by the fatwa of these two people, they refused, including the Hamadan Shiite regiment or the Firouzkoh regiment, etc. He executed the worshipers of Hojjat Mosque in Zanjan by the order of Amir Kabir and Sheikh al-Islam, or he executed them with the strong orders and insistence of Amir Kabir! And because of dominating the southern villages of Zanjan, he has done a service to Qajar! Or, for the sake of becoming a military leader, he will leave Azerbaijan and take a higher military post! Therefore, after the massacre of the people of Zanjan, he was promoted to military rank and became the Amir al-Amraa of the Turks of Azar Baijan! And in this way, he and only three thousand Shia women and children killed an innocent Zanjani in the castle of Alimardan Khan Afshar Zanjan. There are documents that all of them were shouting or Imam Zaman. They were! that there were 3000 people massacred in the same Alimardani Castle and 7 mansions and nests in Saadi Street in the middle of Zanjan, or in the alley behind Saadi Street in the middle of Zanjan, and in addition, there were 48 other trenches in Zanjan and the collective shelter of other inhabitants of the city, including 23,000 women and children. Mass shelters were massacred, or 9 months, and the people of Shahr Zanjan and the city shelters, or with poverty and destitution, "Imam Zaman" that with each cannonball, a part of the same shelters would collapse, so all the inhabitants of the city would go under the ground, or the rest of the inhabitants of the city would also be in the 48 bunkers in groups and fearing for their lives, and some of the books of the Qajar period, such as Naskh al-Tawarikh, and the book of Roza al-Safai of Naseri or In other books of the Qajar period, they have mentioned the bitter events of Zanjan either briefly or ambiguously, but finally Hasan Ali Khan killed them either by the direct order and strong insistence of Amir Kabir Ghalib, or by the fatwa of Shaykh al-Islam Qajar, he killed Zanjan city and them! Finally, about 2,000 women and children were captured, or the poor people of Zanjan were killed, or after they surrendered, they were tortured in ugly ways, and then, according to historical documents, they were shot in the green field of Zanjan square, or they were executed en masse by the fatwa of the same Shaykh al-Islam Qajar. His documents are found in the manuscripts of the old libraries of Iran! To go to Iran-Russia wars? And because the names of the same Afshari khans are seen in the wars between Iran and Russia, they defended the cities of Azerbaijan north of Ars as jihad, and just as Nadershah Afshar, the Turk, or El Arslan, the Seljuk Turk, or Sardar Etropatkan, the Parthian Turk, also defended Azar Baijan, or the same owner. Alimardan Afshar Zanjani Castle or the owner of the same Alimoradkhan Afshar Castle or Abbasqoli Khan Zanjani Castle have been mentioned in the Iran-Russian wars, and the names of other members of the Afshar Zanjan tribe have also been mentioned in the history of the thirty-year wars between Iran and Russia, and they all caused trouble for the Russian government, or at least The other Turks of Azerbaijan should remain silent against the rule of the Russians and rule in Azerbaijan for more than 100 years, or the same Russian military would oppress Kurds and Azar Turks under the rule of Hasan Ali Khan. Who should be killed in front of the Qajar government! And later, the same Qajar rulers and the same practice of behavior did to 400 young clerics and students of Mullah Muhammad Ali Zanjani's jurisprudence. Sheikh Gurban Ali Zanjani, who was a pious and well-educated cleric of the "Afshar Qedar tribe", but he was against the ruling of the same corrupt rulers of Qajar, so he was exiled again or exiled to Iraq! who often opposed the decree of Naser al-Din Shah or other Qajar kings who forced the people! Either he opposed the order of the Qajar mullahs and the encroachment of the lands of the unfortunate tribes of Zanjan, or he supported the oppressed poor people of Qajar, or he opposed the Qajar rulers in the usurpation of their property! Verus and the corrupt Qajar rulers who were included in the disgraceful clauses of Turkmenchai and only the people of Zanjan were dying! Or did they die during the 100 years of Qajar rule, or were they just oppressed by them? Either his properties or their caravanserais were pulled up by Qajar merchants, all of whom were Qajar families, but now the cultural heritage of Zanjan and the names of these types of Qajar merchants have been installed on the heads of most of the usurped caravanserais and the slain Afsharis of the city, and finally, only the people of the city were killed Their property has been removed from their war and finally the real Friday mosque of the city was destroyed or the real Friday imam of the people of the city was killed by the Qajar Amir Kabir who was accepted as a religion by most of the people of Zanjan and today only in the traditional market of Zanjan and only photos or paintings of Qajar It has been installed or it can be seen that they have been installed as a cultural heritage of Zanjan and on the wall of the Zanjan market, which they claim to have built those caravanserais or mosques! And while before this type of Qajar style leech houses in Zanjan, they didn't have any property that has become the cultural heritage of Zanjan today! But nowadays, the government people do not even allow discussion or conversation about the said events and they do not give the writers of the city to talk about the historical past of Zanjan neighborhoods! Or do oral and written discussions in the press and collective circles! And for this reason, Mr. Zarghami must put an end to their ugly favoritism! And let the rest of the city dwellers understand the past history of Zanjan better, how they were killed by the Qajar government agents? Or for what historical reasons did it happen? Or at least be aware of the historical identity of the past neighborhoods of Zanjan! And the same rights as the people of other cities! Or in the discussion of mosques and historical places of cities, they have this kind of cultural right! But people still don't have Zanjan! Either they don't have cultural heritage because of wrong performance or it has not been given to the people of the city! To tell the writers and the history of their city or the facts? Introduce the history of their urban neighborhoods! In which areas of Zanjan did their unfortunate ancestors live? Or for what reasons were they massacred? Or the people who were in Shahr Zanjan in the previous centuries! Or who built the historical monuments of Zanjan Rau Bazaar in the Seljuk period! Or who made it? And now, those who were killed have been underground for 170 years and they do not come out to claim the ownership of the same properties from the banks or from the unknown ownership department of the Ministry of Economy. In addition, most of these types of properties are in the traditional market of Zanjan and have various types of bank loans. They have taken loans from the banks of the Ministry of Contemporary Economy for the renovation of their brick buildings or for the repairs of the same private or noble areas of their cells or for the traditional caravansers of Bazar Zanjan, and therefore it does not belong to Qajar families or Qajar merchants! But denying the rights of the Seljuk waqifs or the Qaraqwinluvia waqifs of the killed Bazar and mosques of Zanjan is not worthy of the CEOs of Iran's banks, nor is it worthy of the Iranian cultural heritage tourism bank! To remove the names of the real waqifs of the same property, mosque, and inn! Or on the contrary, call them Qajar! Or use their endowment baths, cisterns, and mosques in Seljuk Darwa, and stick the name "Qajar Tribe" on the doors of all kinds of caravansers in Zanjan to get back their bank loans! Or will they claim that the land area of the old mosque and the Khawaja Nizam al-Mulk and the endowment are not shari'a? Rather, some Qajar khan has endowed it so that the names of Qajar people and the traditional places of the market can be installed, but they were not effective in the endowment of the property of the Zanjan market? Didn't they have any financial and banking participation in the noble renovation of that caravanserai during the era of Karaquinlu and the Afsharia government? Therefore, they are not the owners of any religious or financial share in the field of religious and endowment of caravansaries or traditional baths in Zanjan! Therefore, the question of the contemporaries is why the cultural heritage of the city does not allow the literate writers of the city and tourists from other cities to tell which neighborhood of Zanjan was built in which century? Or which caravanserai in Zanjan was built in which historical period, the Seljuk period, or the Jastanian period, and the Qara Quvin period, and the Safavid period. And tourists from other cities are also willing to travel to Zanjan! And the well-being of shopping and tourism in the unfortunate Zanjan will increase? Vazira is the same as a traveler from Khuzestan or Lorestan and he is comfortable in his own city! And he can buy a cultural mulberry for 100 thousand tomans at the same price or cheaper! But don't buy from the market of Angoranis living in Zanjan and other cities! Or buy expensive or useless food from a restaurant called Haj Dadash Zanjan or a traditional caravanserai in Zanjan! It is of no use to him that he only has a cultural heritage license! But the quality or price of its food is not different from other cities! Ministers are the same as other tourists and they were able to buy food in the city or buy food cheaper in Zanjan! Faraza ate his food in the same shops next to the Falak Al-Aflak Castle in Khorramabad! Or should he eat his food in some bazaar of Vakil in Shiraz! And don't let the lower bazaar of Zanjan, cultural heritage personnel believe that Mezboro bazaar in the period of 600 years ago and in the period Kora Quvin was not built, but it was built during the new administration of the current managers of cultural heritage of Zanjan, who have ruined the management of the old cultural heritage of Zanjan, so a phenomenon has developed that some restauranteurs of a certain old warehouse of Zanjan or a certain old bathhouse of Zanjan have taken a restaurant license. or they have taken the license of their restaurant away from the cultural heritage and because of the license to cook food and they believe that the history of the building was privatized or the history of the old property of Zanjan is from when the same traditional restaurant owner moved from the village of Zanjan to the city of Zanjan or By taking the cooking nut and the old history of that property, he denies my way! And because of his poor literacy and he is not interested in the old history of the streets or the old neighborhoods of Zanjan! In addition to the cultural heritage signs, it doesn't let him think wisely or understand the reason for the blood of innocent people in the city and in the same place? Therefore, I am forced to write one more time either relying on documented historical documents and the history of developments in the bazaar and the old Juma Mosque in Zanjan, or the history of the new Juma Mosque or the middle Juma Mosque in Zanjan, or the history of the old and new neighborhoods of Zanjan, relying on historical documents? The old neighborhoods of Zanjan from the Parthian period and the Sassanid period, and the new urban neighborhoods of Zanjan up to the present day, and I should say that the daily signs posted by the cultural heritage workers of Zanjan are an obstacle to understanding the history of Zanjan! I will give a historical document for each neighborhood of Zanjan. And shopkeepers who don't even know the history of their own villages or didn't know anything about the history of their village, but now with cultural heritage work permits in the Zanjan market, they believe that in the past, there was no such thing as a traditional and historical market in Zanjan! Was Alimardan Afshar Castle or Akhi Zanjani's Tomb not in Zanjan? Or was it not near his shop with a camera? Rather, he was the founder of Zanjan and he was the one who rented that market shop from the cultural heritage of Zanjan? Or did he get a license to sell food from their office? ?! Or in an old cistern and an old bathhouse in Zanjan Bazaar, and has he obtained permission to cook food and "has a cultural heritage and cooking license"? Or has he obtained permission to sell vegetables in the destroyed place and tomb of Akhi Faraj Zanjani? Or did he get a license to sell vegetables! So he considers himself as an "interpreter of the history of the old buildings of Zanjan"? or "the interpreter of the history of native clothing in Zanjan" He also knows, so he gets the opportunity to wear Bakhtiari clothes in the same place where the traditional broth of Haj Dad is cooked! He introduces to the rest of the tourists that the local clothes of the people of Zanjan are the same as the native clothes of the Bakhtiaris of his restaurant! And this type of issues and conceptualizations in Zanjan's cultural heritage management department has destroyed Zanjan's past history or has brought it to complete vulgarity, and the upper management of the Ministry of Cultural Heritage of the country should think better about that matter and reconsider it fundamentally!
Zanjan's Seljuk era Friday market and mosque and its construction and destruction by Nizam al-Mulk and Amir Kabir (third part)
Zanjan Seljuk era Friday market and mosque
Its construction and destruction by Nizam al-Mulk and Amir Kabir
( third part )
Problems of Islamic capitalism and Asian urban societies
From: Dr. Mohammad Khaleghi Moghadam
Specialization: urban sociologist
There were also other Seljuk garrisons, and Berkiarq Seljuk or the son of Malik Shah Seljuk also fought wars in this area, which was next to the Seljuk Jama Masjid in Zanjan province, whose name is mentioned in the Zanjan region and in the Seljuk era sources And in the same Sejas Zanjan, there are also tombs that have been written on the stone that were martyred in the attack of the Mongols, and also in the city of Qohud (Sain, Abhar Castle and Saru Jahan Fortress). It is one of the seven powerful families of the formation of the Safavid government, or other Turkic peoples, such as the Shamlu people or the Stajelu people, were also Turks, but they did not show compatibility with this Safavid government during the period of Shah Tahmasb, so the English Robert Shirley brothers or the members of the East India Company office in Isfahan and Kerman Wizd, Faris, and Bandar Abbas also advised Shah Abbas that he should set aside the "Afshar and Taklu people" and others in order to establish offices of the East India Company in Isfahan or in the cities of Shiraz, Kerman, Bandar Abbas, and Bandar-Lengeh, or else he would find himself in the hands of the Jolfa Armenians due to the fate of the Iranian business. Christian Georgians, he should settle the trade with Europe in the Abbasid caravansary of his period or do it with the hands of Armenian traders and European Christians and take it out of the hands of Muslim traders! And besides, he should endow most of the properties! Venice "Sadr Endowment Department" to open in Isfahan and instead of mosques and religious schools in the cities of the Seljuk and Timurid periods, who taught the Quranic teachings to the people and Islamic contracts for transactions and trade, and to make the sole and "relying" minister of Quranic education in Iranian cities, schools and mosques, and in the case of trade and transactions Islamization of the markets and hindering the growth of trade was in the hands of European Christians, for this reason, in Iranian cities during the Safavid and Qajar period, they simply built "supports" next to old mosques, and in addition, the administration of the religious areas of Isfahan, Mashhad, Raham, and the Safavid dynasty were removed from the hands of Iranian literate clerics, and they were in the hands of the "Makhund" The people of Lebanon have given a kind of "journalistic jurisprudence" in 50 religious schools and seminaries in Isfahan and Mashhad! In order to implement this type of western policy in Iran, Shah Abbas Safavi chose Isfahan instead of the capital of Qazvin. and followed by The East India Company and the Moscow Company will be messed up, or they will be messed up with the invented "Armenian Darvish Jurisprudence"! Finally, it caused the defeat of the Safavid government! Or did it cause the entry of Afghans, Ottomans, Russians, Wazbeks, Arabs from the south into Iran, and in addition, it changed the "powers of the rulers of the cities" to the detriment of the "underclasses of the city" or "the power of the Khan" or "the extent of the Khan's ownership rights" to the "loss of the people of the city" He changed the role of caravanserais or urban traders or inter-tribal trade to the benefit of Europeans, which in the old Qur'anic jurisprudence, the Seljuk Empire, the Khwarazm Shahi, and the Timurids were not Muslim, nor were there military forces in religious areas. Herat, Bukhara, religious schools of Khwarazm and jurisprudence were not traded, but in Safavid "reliance jurisprudence" and Or their properties were also confiscated by the Qajar mullahs and should be given to other Qajar families in Zanjan, and the names of the villages of the unfortunate Afshari tribes of Zanjan were usurped by the Qajar families, and some of the names of their villages were in the pages of the book Marat Al-Buldan, and some of them were in the travel book of Basir al-Mulk, who was a resident of the Qajar court, and some of them were In the memoirs of Naser al-Din Shah's travelogue, Farang has come to know how the Qajar houses and merchants were usurped, and also the Qajar kings gave the title of Shaykh al-Islami to the same Iranian city and only with the fatwa of the same "Qajar Shaykh al-Islam" and the lives of the people of that city. Could it be in danger or will they be safe? Or to any cleric who was ruled by the sharia judge of an Iranian city and by the same sharia judge's ruling, the Qajar family could confiscate or usurp the property of the same person, the Iranian people, the merchant, or his caravanserai! It was possible that European soldiers, such as Austria or others, had been drawn to military courses, political courses, history writing, and cultural knowledge at Dar al-Funun or the occasional publication of that Dar al-Funun school and the national library branched from that school, which were advertised by the English printing house of Mirza Saleh Shirazi Freemasons. And all the students of the military school or the political school or the school of Falahat Dar al-Funun were also corrupt Qajar princes who studied in the school of Amir Kabiro and other social classes of Iran were not allowed to study at Dar al-Funun! And it was such a "religion" that was different from the religion of Fuqe, Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk, the supreme leader of the Asian Muslims of the Seljuqs, and "from the earth to the sky", or from the "philosophy of the founder of his Shafi'i jurisprudence" and from the military schools of Iran and "the earth and the sky", or from jurisprudence. Neo-Hanafi that Khwaja Nasir al-Din Tusi, Sadr Azam of Halakukhan or with "Islamic jurisprudence of trade and zamindari" In the teaching jurisprudence of the religious schools of Tabriz and Sultaniyeh during the Asian empire period, Khwaja Shams al-Din Juvini differed from the jurisprudence of Ghiyas al-Din Pir Ahmad Khafi, the supreme leader of the Timurid era, who had founded at least 80 religious schools in the city of Herat, including the religious schools of Herat. There was no usurpation of people's lands or fraud in endowments or high prices in buying and selling or fraud in farms and urban trade like the religious schools of the Qajar era and religious propaganda! Therefore, in such a culture of ignorance created by the hired mullahs of the Safavid kings, it was taught in the 50 court religious schools of Isfahan, where jurisprudence was taught in the large Jeddah school or the small Jeddah school or the religious school of Sheikh Lasifullah Jabal Ameli in Naqsh Jahan Square, Isfahan, or in the four schools. The garden of Sultan Hossein Safavid was used to teach jurisprudence and "difference between the Qur'an and hadith and jurisprudential inference" Sabzeh Maidan of Zanjan massacred and poured into the ditches in the south of the city, whose documents exist in historical sources. Vari "Nadergholi Khan Garkhlo Afshar" had been feeling danger for his family for a long time, but he stepped forward to fulfill a religious and national goal and expel foreigners from Iran. The chiefs of Afshar clans of the unfortunate Afshar tribes of different regions of Iran also asked for help and with their cooperation, save Iran from the evil of its 5 neighboring neighbors. Vanhaita, with the help of the Afshar tribes and all the armed armies of the five neighboring countries, expelled them from the territory of Iran, and in addition, took 20 Asian countries, which were accomplices with the invaders, but after taking India, they were preparing Qochan and "the same Afshar army" in Fathabad. to attack China, and China had recently come under the control of the East India Company in this historical period, so after the fall of India and "European trading companies" While the report of the European traveler is the opposite! And after seeing the ruins of the Mongol era in Zanjan, he writes or reports in his book, or he is surprised by the many ruins of the Seljuk and Shafi'i mosques in Zanjan! Or he is surprised by their destruction in Zanjan! And this is the urban development of the Seljuk period, while the historians of the 3rd and 4th centuries of Hijri, after the Arab attack on Zanjan, did not mention any type of urban development for Zanjan in the first 4th century of Hijri, for example, in the books of Al-Maslak and Mamalek or in the book "Ahsan Atqasim" of Viadar Kitab. "Alag al-Nafsiya" and the book "Hudud al-Alam" etc. and in these third and fourth centuries do not have Zanjan and only empty mention of the word Zanjan in the middle of "Dictionaries of other cities" Finally, the Sultan of Darul Caliphate of Tehran ordered Amir Kabir to act like Hajjaj Yusuf Thaqafi and destroy the Hujjat Mosque in Zanjan, or to kill the Friday Imam of the same mosque, or to kill the Shiite worshipers in a mob, and not to resist the Qajar Amir, who is the ruler of the city, whether he was the Shah's uncle or not. Behind the heads of the same two clerics, they have received an order from the Qajar to pray and not turn their heads! The fatwa to kill Anan Rahm was taken from the scholars of Isfahan religious school affiliated to the East India Company, and still the Shaykh al-Islami of Ijtihad from the Kalbasi Mosque of Isfahan, who believe that these two mosques of Hojjat or the second Friday mosque of Zanjan are not Shiite mosques, but rather the Shafi'i mosque of the Seljuks and the Qaraqinlu era, and are heritage personnel. The culture of Zanjan is also subject to their jurisprudence, hence the name " There was a Qajar administrative director in Zanjan, so he has made historical distortions in the schools and cultural heritage of Zanjan, or with the transfer of the library of Amir Kabir and Nasershahi Dar al-Funun to the National Library of Iran, and this kind of national censorship of the history of Zanjan has increased. And has he not won in the mentioned period? Or do they know about the events of the days of those who were killed during the Naseri era? Or how during the Naseri period, the names of the founders of the old mosques in Zanjan were removed, or perhaps the names of the mosques named Masjid Ishaq Mir Za Qajar or Masjid Shukra Elah Mir Za Qajar? Is it because the people of Zanjan did not pray at Qajar Abdullah Mirza's Juma Mosque, and do they know about it? And it is in such a situation that Naser al-Din forced Shah Qajar and Amir Kabir to rain cannons on his house, mosques, caravanserais, or homes of the people of Zanjan for 11 months, or to destroy the Friday Shia mosque in Zanjan! On the other side of the upper bazaar, local kings and local Seljuk governors established Zanjan, or they had built the Seljuk market in the east of Zanjan with the instructions of Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk Tusiwan, or it was built with the money from the agricultural income of different villages in Iran, or with the income of trade routes and during 190 It was built in Sal and Yokhari neighborhood of Zanjan, or by different architects from different parts of Iran, or with the advice of Nizam al-Mulk Tusi, who had brought it, or the squares and two Seljuk Qaisarias of Zanjan, or the two four sides of Zanjan, or the caravanserais and the Seljuk Friday Mosque of Zanjan, or the baths and water tanks. And the commercial cellars were built in the style of the Seljuk bazaar of Isfahan and Mero, and he had seen those mosques and uninhabited buildings in Zanjan during the Mughal era! which was subject to destruction due to the Mongol attack, and the King of Qaraqvinlu was forced to "establish the new market of Qaraqvinlu" And in Zanjan, he built the base of the small Qayseriyah of Qaraqwinlu, or the base of the two government caravansaries of Golshan, or the caravansary of Malik al-Tajjar and its twin bath in the lower bazaar, which are mentioned in the book of Dar al-Irfan and its construction in the era of Qaraqwinlu, or with the establishment of the second Friday mosque in Zanjan and named He built the "Friday Five Mihrabi Mosque of Zanjan" in the lower bazaar of Zanjan, which today is commonly called the "Ayatollah Qaimi Mosque" and they believe that he built that mosque during the Pahlavi period. Or, in front of that, he built the Second Juma Mosque in Zanjan and the "Qara Qovinlu State Bath", which today is commonly known as "Haj Dadash's dining room". "Khamsa" or "Merah Al-Baldan" book and its destruction "Jahanshahi Mosque Zanjan" Are they registered as cultural heritage so that it is not known whether it belongs to the cultural heritage of the past or is it new? Or with the contemporary cultural heritage panels that have been installed on their doors? Some of them have become new passages, and probably today there is a two-yard caravanserai of Haj Fethullah and Haj Nahali in the lower market, which is the same as the caravanserai of Haj Abdul Razzaq, or according to the documentary of the book Jang Zanjan was part of the Karaqvinlu market complex, which was connected to the Werkchi square in Zanjan, or it was connected to the fruit sellers' square and the fruit sellers' bathroom in the lower bazaar. The houses of Zanjan have also been registered as cultural heritage in the name of Qajar merchants and houses in Zanjan, or they have been registered as cultural heritages, or they have been registered with the efforts of the first Qajar General Director of the Zanjan Department of Culture and Knowledge, who was appointed by Muzaffar al-Din Shah as the "General Department of Culture and Knowledge of Zanjan". It happened because of the usurpation of the cultural titles of Zanjan, or in the case of the real builders of the Zanjan market, their good names were removed, and the names of the remnants of Salihat were not mentioned, or it happened in the case of the taverns, its villages, and its mosques, and it all happened for the benefit of the Qajar family! That is nothing but Have they not created destruction in Zanjan? But with the false propaganda of the said administration, all the tourists from different Iranian cities and still traveling to and from Zanjan believe that the entire traditional market of Zanjan was built by "Qajar" or its parts and elements are "only Qajar". It was built, but there is no cultural heritage in Zanjan from the era of the 56 former governments of Iran, or from their era, and there is no endowment heritage in Zanjan! Rather, they all belong to the Qajar period, while on the contrary, during the period of Amir Kabir Qajar and all the past historical buildings of Zanjan were destroyed, or the Qajar family, in addition to usurping the property of the old Seljuk population, forced and forced Qaraqinlu Zanjan and the good traditions of the Qur'anic teachings or waqf They established or mentioned the previous endowments of the mosques in the name of their usurping Qajar family, so all the previous endowments became the personal property of the Qajar family after the massacre of the inhabitants of Zanjan and Jaro, or became part of the property of the Qajar and Zanjan bazaar complex, in addition to 23 thousand inhabitants. They also killed the unfortunate Zanjan, so today Mr. Zarghami or the Minister of Cultural Heritage of Iran can refer to the handwritten documents and manuscripts of that time and for example "The Book of the War of Zanjan" They have referred to other books and know how the market endowments of Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk Tusi and the Bait al-Mal of the Court of Appeal of Iran were made, or how in the Qajar period, his endowment came in the form of the personal property of the Qajar family, or how the commercial endowments of the Muslim prime minister of the Seljuq period in Zanjan And how did it get ruined? That its benefits did not reach any caravan passing through Zanjan? Or the income of Seljuk era caravanserais in Zanjan, which was usurped by members of the Qajar family, or was brought by the order of Naser al-Din Shah, or by the order of Shah Qajar to the Register of Deeds, or to the endowment office of Zanjan, and he taught fraud in religious endowments, or with He had given an order to the Register of Documents of the Nasrid Era and to register all the usurped properties and those killed by forging a document with the name of "the people and relatives of the wide and long Qajara family!" And they were not the ones who managed the cities, but they had the right upbringing! In addition, the former Shafi'i or Hanafi jurisprudence was also prevented from correcting the financial control of the aforementioned city rulers, or after receiving the order of the "urban ombudsman" and the "urban cargo order" or the "order of the administration of trade contracts and urban guilds" and the "trading system of Iranian markets" They didn't destroy it, or after taking the agricultural estates and the real estate administration of Iran's villages, they didn't destroy the "village agriculture and Islamic farms"! Or they didn't destroy the "farm contracts administration and irrigation courses" and the ownership of villages, poultry farming, and livestock farming during the reign of the Seljuks and Timurids! Or later From getting the endowment decree and with my jurisprudence, you brought Qajar kings and endowment contracts. Or they would not destroy God's orders in the Qur'an! Rather, he knew the meaning and concept of Asian Islamic religious and jurisprudence seminary of the Seljuk Empire or the Timurid Empire in Asia, and they respected justice for the benefit of "Asian peoples and their cities", or like Imam Juma of the cities of the Qajar period and the fatwa of killing the people of the cities of Zanjan, Niriz, Barforosh and Beshroi. And didn't they say that they didn't have a political uprising and were only upset about the aggression of the rulers of their Qajar cities and their women? Or wouldn't they have issued a fatwa to usurp the property of that unfortunate class? In addition, no cleric of the past 14 centuries had made all these Quranic verses or hadiths of our imams minister! And unfortunately, English jurisprudence, which is the basis of "legitimacy of the Qajar state and people" And it was not like that in the texts of the Qur'an! Or did he consider such legitimacy for Seljuk city rulers? Or for city judges, or for city ombudsmen, or for the benefit of urban Shaykh al-Salam, and in Shafi'i jurisprudence, military schools were not considered! Or was it for the benefit of the urban farmers or for the benefit of the chieftains who managed the countryside during the Seljuk period and the administration of the estates and plantations? And only "the invention of Isfahan Seminary is the period of Fath Alishahmi, who taught the interpretation of the Qur'an by teaching the Jews of the East India Company of Isfahan and giving it to the ignorant people of Iran, that they had "fake the Qur'an" or it was only for the benefit of the emissaries of the East India Company, who were among pseudo-marketers. There were many Muslims and wealth seekers in Isfahan, or they regularly came and went to the court of Fath al-Shah, or they distorted the religion, and all of them have arisen, and therefore the "legitimization of jurisprudence" to the "government of Fath al-Shahi" It is different from them, or the relationship between religion and the state and the political sociology of Europeans is different, or it is different in understanding the "relationship between religion and the state", or it is different in understanding the history of ownership and the way of administration of Asian cities and European cities, and it is different from two perspectives. ? Or the political views of Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk and the Qur'an and the control of the Seljuk Turkish houses and 190 years of land ownership or agriculture differed from the Asians and the money laundering considered by "Isfahan Jurisprudence" and none of the urban houses of the Mongol or Timurid era were similar to the management of the Qajar houses or the management Was it not the concept of the religious administration of the cities of the Qajar period, that the rights of the 31 ethnic groups of the province, Turks, Kurds, and Baloch, would be oppressed in favor of the "Qajar noble class" and religious interpretation? And if Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk Tusi, who was the prime minister of the Seljuk era, or "he was a political jurist" They used to have a division in Zanjan, and the same people, with the help of Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk, the Seljuk dynasty, had laid the foundation of the Sarnati mosque in the east of Zanjan, or they had laid the foundation of the Jame Mosque, the Seljuk Qaysariyya, and the Dar al-Hokuma of Zanjan, which was also the place of their rule, and the remains of the former Sassanid fortress, which was repaired They had made the desert behind Kohandajmzbor a traditional bazaar, or they had turned it into a "roofed and safe bazaar" with the benevolent religious thought of Nizam al-Mulk, or they had made it a "roofed and safe bazaar" for urban shopping, and they had made it so that caravans passing through Zanjan would be safe, or at least below A roof and a closed door of the caravanserai are sleeping! Or their property should not be looted at night by thieves! Or they can drink from our water tank in the urban caravanserai! Rao elevated or kept them safe from abuse in urban governance, and instead of coercion in the cities, they turned into responsible and disciplined city managers, so the construction complex or a good urban settlement was left in Zanjan, and it is the result of this benevolent minister that Clavikho and seeing their good works He was surprised at the construction of the mosque and caravanserai in Zanjan, but what was the result of the benevolence of Isfahan jurisprudence or the Marvi Qajar school in Tehran? And it was only the creation of English jurisprudence in the said schools that the people of Zanjan were killed, or it was only the usurpation of the endowments of the mosques of Zanjan and selling them for the benefit of the drinking of Qajar priests, or the killing of 23 thousand innocent people was Zanjan, and they also called it "Qajar Shia jurisprudence" because of their cleverness, while in the jurisprudence of Imams Shia and usurpation is usurpation and usurpation of endowments or eating people's property is also forbidden according to the verses of the Qur'an, and deriving religious rules from the texts of the Qur'an does not make a difference between Shia or Sunni jurisprudence! And the implementation or non-implementation of Quranic verses is not discussed, or is it not discussed by a government and its employees? There are only marginal disputes in the approximation of religions, but Nizam al-Mulk believed that if the Seljuq king and his urban rulers and Shafi'i jurisprudence did not implement military schools and only "religious jurisprudence, they will use their shamanism in Iranian cities and other countries!" The Shari'ah that "Kelini" did and gave legitimacy to the "personal passions of the Shahs of Al-Buyeh" and to the detriment of the people and the wealth of Kiri Al-Buyeh, or called "the assignment of public representation to "Shah Azdal-Dulah of Al-Buyeh" They were not in charge of the cities, but they did not have proper training, and in addition, the Shafi'i jurisprudence or the former Hanafi jurisprudence and the same gave correct financial control to the city rulers, or after receiving the verdict of the muhtasib or the city charge and the administration of trade contracts or market trade, it was not destroyed, so this is a wrong view. Isfahan province and commercial verses of the Quran, did it violate the verses of the Quran on endowment or malamalati, or did it violate the verses of the Quran on renting and owning land, and it was only promoted in the jurisprudence of the religious schools of Isfahan, which have no answer to them and to any Iranian people? Or they do not find out that this type of jurisprudence was invented by Isfahan mosques and in which surah of the Qur'an is there, which was given in the mosques of Isfahan and culturally, while the sociology of the political jurisprudence of Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk and the understanding of the relationship between "religionists and government officials" But it is different from the jurisprudence of Khwaja Nizam al-Mulk, whose tomb in Isfahan is still not paid attention to by anyone, or no one asks why Nizam al-Mullam built the Seljuq mosque or the Seljuq bazaar in Isfahan? And why did he build Vanishabur and Marura? Or why did he waste thirty years of his chancellorship during the reign of El Arslan and Malik Shah Seljuk so that the caravans in Iranian cities would have a safe place to stay? And on the contrary, everyone praises Amir Kabir, who built everything that Nizam al-Mulk established, and destroyed it with the fatwa of the Sheikhs of Isfahan, while the chancellorship of Amir al-Mulk and Nizam al-Mulk are not comparable to each other. The death of English Captain Lindsay, Captain Christie, and English Major Campbell, who brought his father Muhammad Shah Qajar to the royal power with English artillery and against his opponents, and Amir Kabir also became the Amir Nizam before he became the Prime Minister and colluded with England.
این وبلاگ شامل :